sharetrader
Page 103 of 446 FirstFirst ... 3539399100101102103104105106107113153203 ... LastLast
Results 1,021 to 1,030 of 4451

Thread: Snakk

  1. #1021
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,636

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Copper View Post
    Point taken but Snakk was not a backdoor listing.Montana and Hellaby and Chase were backdoor listings so all are not bad.I know Chase went away but he others are still ok.
    Montana was not a backdoor listing - it was part of CIL and when all the other assets of CIL were sold off, CIL was renamed Montana.

    https://www.nzx.com/files/assets/rev...dance_note.pdf

    "Compliance listings are similar to reverse and backdoor listings, in
    that the listing is usually completed without the need to complete
    disclosure documents under the Securities Act."

    To me Compliance listing is worse than backdoor listing - appearance of decency but same smelly unwashed undies.
    Last edited by Balance; 31-08-2013 at 10:22 AM.

  2. #1022
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    614

    Default

    maybe Balance re Montana. but I based my post on an article by Brian Gaynor in February 2008.he explained the sequence of events when they bought Montana etc.He said it was perhaps the most successful backdoor listing.May be a matter of interpretation.

  3. #1023
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Copper View Post
    maybe Balance re Montana. but I based my post on an article by Brian Gaynor in February 2008.he explained the sequence of events when they bought Montana etc.He said it was perhaps the most successful backdoor listing.May be a matter of interpretation.
    Montana was not a backdoor listing. CIL sold of all of their investments other than Montana, then changed their name to Montana. GPG are doing exactly the same thing i.e. sell everything bar Coates, and then change the name from GPG to Coates. There is nothing inherently wrong with a backdoor listing. You just need to exercise a bit more caution. Like I have said before, Abano and Charlies were both successful backdoor listing. Compliance listing are just, well, just what they say they are, for compliance and quite benign.

  4. #1024
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    3,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zigzag View Post
    GPG are doing exactly the same thing i.e. sell everything bar Coates, and then change the name from GPG to Coates..
    Tower has done the same, decimating its business so much that it is being forced to hold more capital. But I digress
    Free delivery worldwide with Book Depository http://www.bookdepository.co.uk

  5. #1025
    ? steve fleming's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,703

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Montana was not a backdoor listing - it was part of CIL and when all the other assets of CIL were sold off, CIL was renamed Montana.

    https://www.nzx.com/files/assets/rev...dance_note.pdf

    "Compliance listings are similar to reverse and backdoor listings, in
    that the listing is usually completed without the need to complete
    disclosure documents under the Securities Act."

    To me Compliance listing is worse than backdoor listing - appearance of decency but same smelly unwashed undies.
    On the ASX all new listings (IPOs, backdoor, compliance) are subject to the same disclosure requirements - mainly an ASIC approved Prospectus

    Backdoor listings on the ASX have an added level of compliance in that the existing shareholders are required to approve the change of activities, which means there are additional expert reports and documentation required to support the shareholder vote.

    I don't know why the NZX would be so lax.
    Share prices follow earnings....buy EPS growth!!



  6. #1026
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    614

    Default

    Many tks Balance and others for a good discussion. I went back to Brian Gaynors article and he used the terms backdoor listing and reverse listing on the same company.Definitely a difference in my opinion.Good comment on ASX Steve.
    Regards

  7. #1027
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    2,169

    Default

    Is that you Moosie....300,000 at .093c to buy. Good on you mate, thats what we like to see.

  8. #1028
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,636

    Default

    You have to laugh at the little games being played at the snake pit.

    Someone sold the shares down to 9.1c and out pops a buyer at 9.5c with fresh air between him and 9.1c.

    He gets taken out in plenty quick time.

    Now what kind of idiot pays 9.5c when the trdaes are going through at 9.1c?

  9. #1029
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,636

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moosie_900 View Post
    lol, looks like you've caught the snakk day trading bug eh balance? good fun to watch (but not participate in) eh?
    I like to watch the massaging of the snake as it slithers along the slippery slope.

    See how someone has had enough and took out all the 9 cents?
    Last edited by Balance; 18-09-2013 at 12:11 PM.

  10. #1030
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    614

    Default

    Do either of you guys know why your number of posts has not gone up for months despite all the action. Mine haven't either.That's the number under your join date etc.Just curious.It's one of those lazy days when the mind strays to other useless pastimes.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •