sharetrader
Page 278 of 278 FirstFirst ... 178228268274275276277278
Results 5,541 to 5,555 of 5555
  1. #5541
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    hamilton
    Posts
    274

    Default

    resignation surely.

  2. #5542
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Comment today, credit BullionVault, on gold doing better than gold miners, that seens relevant.

    "You would have been far better off just buying the metal. Far less risk; far greater gain.Management of mining companies have to take a lot of responsibility for this. They haven't run their companies well. Incompetence is a sector-wide affliction. Bad decision follows bad decision. Companies are often run in the interests of management, not shareholders."

  3. #5543
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waltzingironmansinlgescul View Post
    resignation surely.
    Hard to see that happening. They've got a holiday planned:

    This critical milestone allows the scoping siting and ultimately procurement of a suitable plant meeting higher volumes with anapplication for resource consent for the larger plant to be lodged once the specific plant has been identified. While a number ofplants which may suit have been located the travel restrictions still in place mean site visits may be some time away.
    From page 7 of the AR.

  4. #5544
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,064

    Default

    Nothing to see, blah blah blah:

    ANNOUNCEMENT BY NEW TALISMAN GOLD MINES LIMITED (ASX, NZX:NTL)
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    New Talisman is aware of the allegations published in NZ Herald online late on Friday 3 July in relation to the company CEO.
    We understand that the allegations were made by an administrator on Sharetrader after the Company CEO wrote to Sharetrader to complain and to request they investigate and consider removing malicious postings being published on the Sharetrader.co.nz site with respect to the Company CEO personally and the Company.
    The Company is investigating the content of the postings made on Sharetrader.co.nz that have been alleged by Sharetrader to have been made by the Company CEO, to ascertain whether the content of those postings gives rise to concerns in respect of disclosure requirements.
    The Company, will not be commenting on this matter until the outcome of those enquiries are complete.

  5. #5545
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    222

    Default

    "after the Company CEO wrote to Sharetrader to complain and to request they investigate" Are they saying that Matt Hill was the one who wrote to Sharetrader to complain and request the investigation?

  6. #5546
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    5

    Default

    The guy deserves to be charged not just resigning. The fact the board hasn’t stood him down pending investigation is very poor. The FMA should be investigating more then just a few rambling comments on this thread. Makes you wonder if there is actually any gold at all!

  7. #5547
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    5

    Default

    I wonder if David Clark would be keen to be the new CEO. Even he could achieve more then MH

  8. #5548
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    49

    Default

    New Talisman is aware of the allegations published in NZ Herald online late on Friday 3 July in relation to the company CEO.
    We understand that the allegations were made by an administrator on Sharetrader after the Company CEO wrote to Sharetrader to complain and to request they investigate and consider removing malicious postings being published on the Sharetrader.co.nz site with respect to the Company CEO personally and the Company.
    The Company is investigating the content of the postings made on Sharetrader.co.nz that have been alleged by Sharetrader to have been made by the Company CEO, to ascertain whether the content of those postings gives rise to concerns in respect of disclosure requirements.
    The Company, will not be commenting on this matter until the outcome of those enquiries are complete.[/QUOTE]

    No, no, no. Is someone misleading the Board ? The issue was identified in post #5446 by Vince. If you are a CEO or similar then you should id yourself before posting comments. It was not about malicious comments but rather hiding behind a nom de plume

    zacman

  9. #5549
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,672

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fundamentalfinder View Post
    Makes you wonder if there is actually any gold at all!
    And what is your motivation with this malicious and ridiculous comment?

    NTL has just released a Peer Review of its JORC. Are you also maligning the company that undertook the Peer Review? The author is on the JORC Committee if I recall correctly.

  10. #5550
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    hamilton
    Posts
    274

    Default

    FMA needs to investigate and investigate the release notice and info the NZX of its finding including the boards response. Wider investigation required by FMA to include the boards response to the market and shareholders. If the board is found to have mislead shareholders deliberately. The minutes of the meeting of the board regarding the matter need to be published if there indeed a meeting as yet. If the CEO is found to have mislead shareholders here then the matter is of a far more serious nature.
    Last edited by Waltzingironmansinlgescul; Today at 02:20 PM.

  11. #5551
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    468

    Default

    The Company, will not be commenting on this matter until the outcome of those enquiries are complete.[/QUOTE]

    I for one couldn't care less if they comment or don't comment on malicious posts on this thread.

    I would however like them to comment on their CEO posting on this thread without full disclosure.

  12. #5552
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,672

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Waltzingironmansinlgescul View Post
    FMA needs to investigate and investigate the release notice and info the NZX of its finding including the boards response. Wider investigation required by FMA to include the boards response to the market and shareholders. If the board is found to have mislead shareholders deliberately. The minutes of the meeting of the board regarding the matter need to be published if there indeed a meeting as yet. If the CEO is found to have mislead shareholders here then the matter is of a far more serious nature.
    Take a deep breath Waltzing.

    How have you jumped to wondering if the Board has misled shareholders?

    The FMA have criteria they will check. I doubt whether not complying with Sharetrader's site rules is one of them. The FMA's interest would be as to whether any Market Disclosure rules have been breached. Don't confuse that with Sharetrader's disclosure rules.

  13. #5553
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zacman View Post
    New Talisman is aware of the allegations published in NZ Herald online late on Friday 3 July in relation to the company CEO.
    We understand that the allegations were made by an administrator on Sharetrader after the Company CEO wrote to Sharetrader to complain and to request they investigate and consider removing malicious postings being published on the Sharetrader.co.nz site with respect to the Company CEO personally and the Company.
    The Company is investigating the content of the postings made on Sharetrader.co.nz that have been alleged by Sharetrader to have been made by the Company CEO, to ascertain whether the content of those postings gives rise to concerns in respect of disclosure requirements.
    The Company, will not be commenting on this matter until the outcome of those enquiries are complete.
    No, no, no. Is someone misleading the Board ? The issue was identified in post #5446 by Vince. If you are a CEO or similar then you should id yourself before posting comments. It was not about malicious comments but rather hiding behind a nom de plume

    zacman[/QUOTE]
    This is becoming even more murky. Am I right in thinking that MH wrote to Sharetrader on behalf of NTL complaining about malicious statements while in parallel allegedly responding to these 'anonymously' through Sharetrader? What, if anything, was MH telling the rest of the Board while this was happening? What triggered Vince into investigating Bullish rather than the source of these statements? I also look forward to the outcome of Jonu's moderation enquiry. This needs to be resolved decisively to protect NTL with the press already on the trail.

  14. #5554
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    284

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paint it Black View Post
    This is becoming even more murky. .....
    I agree.
    I want to know the timeline - What events lead up to Bullish getting banned?
    Did MH message this website directly just before this site's admin investigation?

    It's starting to become a case of he said, she said.
    Someone could end up with libel/slander accusations?

  15. #5555
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,876

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stumpynuts View Post
    I agree.
    I want to know the timeline - What events lead up to Bullish getting banned?
    Did MH message this website directly just before this site's admin investigation?

    It's starting to become a case of he said, she said.
    Someone could end up with libel/slander accusations?
    It sounds pretty simple to me imo it looks like CEO was posting as Bullish on this site and not disclosing who he was . Obviously signed up with an email for this .
    Then seperately he took exception to some of the posters on here ( read the thread) bagging him for poor performance etc .... maybe he used the same email to complain to sharetrader with and admin put 2 & 2 together .......

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •