-
05-12-2017, 09:21 PM
#3641
Junior Member
Exactly. The announcement didn’t tell us anything that they couldn’t have reported 10 days ago. So why didn’t they!
-
05-12-2017, 10:11 PM
#3642
Member
8.18 gms/ tonne, max. Thats within good to average range for underground. Only agreed by council to allow 20,000 m2 out, & some doubt if that's per year or in total over the two year consent. Say 6gms/ tonne x 40 000 t. Concentrator quadruples that - 24 g, 3/4 an ounce per tonne, 30,000 oz, thats say $30m profit over two years, $15m a year, I guess thats a $150m company if it happened. $150m , 2 billion shares, 7.5c @ 10% yield. If it happens, and is allowed to continue past second year. The gamble continues!
-
05-12-2017, 10:20 PM
#3643
Member
Anyone know why NTLOA still live quoted? Surely they die on the 29th Nov? There can't be an extension, surely, despite recent commentary?
-
06-12-2017, 09:10 AM
#3644
-
06-12-2017, 09:15 AM
#3645
Originally Posted by Mbro
8.18 gms/ tonne, max. Thats within good to average range for underground. Only agreed by council to allow 20,000 m2 out, & some doubt if that's per year or in total over the two year consent. Say 6gms/ tonne x 40 000 t. Concentrator quadruples that - 24 g, 3/4 an ounce per tonne, 30,000 oz, thats say $30m profit over two years, $15m a year, I guess thats a $150m company if it happened. $150m , 2 billion shares, 7.5c @ 10% yield. If it happens, and is allowed to continue past second year. The gamble continues!
I am certain that that it is 20,000 m3 per annum from all the information that I have read. The density of the rock is about 2.5 tonnes /m3. That would make your above ball park calculated profit $37.5m per annum. Share price of 17.5 c per share at a PE of 10.
I think that the material that they are sampling is rubble left behind from the previous mining operations so I expect the mined grades to be higher.
Last edited by Brain; 06-12-2017 at 09:21 AM.
Reason: Incorrect share price calc
-
06-12-2017, 09:16 AM
#3646
Member
There are three sell orders for 50c and $1...Thats "heights of optimism" eh?
-
06-12-2017, 09:33 AM
#3647
Looking like impressive opening volume. Why on earth would you sell sub 2.2? (that being the SPP level) I guess everyone has their own strategies.
-
06-12-2017, 09:51 AM
#3648
Originally Posted by jonu
Looking like impressive opening volume. Why on earth would you sell sub 2.2? (that being the SPP level) I guess everyone has their own strategies.
I guess if you bought at .014 selling now would net you a cool 30% profit,but I know what you mean why would you sell with tonnes of gold down there!
-
06-12-2017, 10:05 AM
#3649
Banned
Well there's. People could be listening to that moose. Silly people.
-
06-12-2017, 10:09 AM
#3650
[QUOTE=Fatboyj;695265]Well there's a well, downramp the stock to oblivion. People could be listening to that moose. Silly people.
I gave up engaging with the Moose as we were talking at cross purposes most of the time. He is a brilliant hindsight trader, I'll give him that.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks