-
10-08-2020, 11:05 AM
#5961
Member
Originally Posted by jonu
More determined ignorance!
An independent third party came to the conclusion around the bullish posts. Your welcome to your views on what won't happen next, but given the ignorance on display I know what value to place on them.
We have no idea who the independent third party was so how sure can you actually be that they were independent or they did anything more than a cursory review. You get on so well with the Matt obviously, why dont you ask them to release that information to the market so we can be the judge of that.
-
10-08-2020, 11:26 AM
#5962
Originally Posted by suse
We have no idea who the independent third party was so how sure can you actually be that they were independent or they did anything more than a cursory review. You get on so well with the Matt obviously, why dont you ask them to release that information to the market so we can be the judge of that.
Hit the nail on the head there suse. Who was this 3rd party 'independent reviewer'? It could be the CEO's cat for all we know.
-
10-08-2020, 11:49 AM
#5963
Member
Originally Posted by suse
We have no idea who the independent third party was so how sure can you actually be that they were independent or they did anything more than a cursory review. You get on so well with the Matt obviously, why dont you ask them to release that information to the market so we can be the judge of that.
Originally Posted by ThaiJohn
Hit the nail on the head there suse. Who was this 3rd party 'independent reviewer'? It could be the CEO's cat for all we know.
And who paid for the 3rd party 'independent reviewer'???? Yup we all know the answer to that one I guess.
-
10-08-2020, 11:52 AM
#5964
Originally Posted by jonu
Regardless, whoever bullish was, they haven't misled the market, unlike several other anonymous posters here.
Originally Posted by jonu
SPP bonus shares have been issued and didn't collapse the price. Why? Because they would largely have been taken up by holders who realise the potential of the company. Combine that with a rocketing POG, Peer Reviewed JORC and NTL saying they are in talks with a processor, it is hardly surprising that serious investors are lining up.
NTL are not "in talks with a processor":
Originally Posted by NTL June 2020 quarterly report
...discussions have commenced with a high profile NZ industry group andwork is underway on the evaluation of the potential for a formal collaboration that could facilitatefunding, delivery and operation of a joint processing plant
You also stated this earlier:
Originally Posted by jonu
The FMA haven't shown any interest, presumably for the same reason.
Evidence please
-
10-08-2020, 11:52 AM
#5965
Member
If your so worried Sell out and be done with it.
-
10-08-2020, 12:00 PM
#5966
Ltw, I wondered what happened to you.
Other posters were saying there were few questions at meeting,
Did you air yours, and what were the answers?
-
10-08-2020, 12:28 PM
#5967
Originally Posted by Ltw
If your so worried Sell out and be done with it.
I think we just want some answers. Its not asking too much for the details of the independent reviewer, and the comment about no interest shown from the FMA. Lets find out, put it to bed and move forward.
-
10-08-2020, 01:04 PM
#5968
Originally Posted by ThaiJohn
I think we just want some answers. Its not asking too much for the details of the independent reviewer, and the comment about no interest shown from the FMA. Lets find out, put it to bed and move forward.
Happily NTL doesn't need to jump for every ranter on H/C and this site. ThaiJohn says he sold out....so has no right to demand anything. Suse...who knows whether they are a shareholder? Ask the question of them yourself if you are so concerned. Various posters are ranting on the assumption the Directors are misleading the market. They of course have no evidence for this...but don't let it get in the way of a good conspiracy!
If someone is a shareholder they should seek clarification from NTL about the third party if they so wish. As usual, mud is being slung, conspiracies dreamed up and the usual suspects demanding to be spoon fed answers to their own conspiracies.
In response to haewai around the FMA. There is no evidence....that's my point. As to being in talks with a processor....I stand by the comment. Haewai appears to interpret the company statement differently.
Last edited by jonu; 10-08-2020 at 01:35 PM.
Reason: typo
-
10-08-2020, 01:28 PM
#5969
Thanks Jonu. I have been in direct contact with the CEO. I am not going to go into great detail about the conversations and text messaging plus the late night phone call. I wanted some answers and accountability like most other shareholders, as I was sick of the standard 'its coming' so I approached the CEO direct back in March. I asked him straight up " what's the delay, when are we going to see any gold?" What followed was a barrage of abuse, (in both directions I must add) threats of defamation ( from a post I wrote on HC ) "Defamation suit in absentia..its like taking candy from a baby" was one of the replies from this guy, plus other dribble. So I sold down all of my holding at a loss. The questions is still valid though. Who was the independent reviewer and the comment about no interest from the FMA. Why is is so difficult for NTL to reach out and let us know?
-
10-08-2020, 01:37 PM
#5970
i concur that any response I got out of Matt, was delayed, brief, and terse.
Hence my use of this forum.
Last edited by Getty; 10-08-2020 at 01:39 PM.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks