-
22-06-2021, 04:33 PM
#7381
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/300...50kplus-report
Make it easier to fire those earning $250k-plus: Report
But at $250,000 that would capture only senior management roles.
He said that was the starting salary for Government Ministers, who could be dismissed without cause.
“This threshold would capture less than the top 1 per cent of income earners, while capturing the CEOs and senior managers whose roles have the most significant impact on productivity,” Partridge said.
“Regulations would permit the threshold to be adjusted annually to track increases in New Zealand’s median income.”
Last edited by nztx; 22-06-2021 at 04:35 PM.
-
30-06-2021, 02:21 PM
#7382
Annual report out today, approx $1.1 left, where to from here , a 100/1 con and then a C R @ ?
-
30-06-2021, 02:28 PM
#7383
Gravy
"Payments for consulting services to companies in which directors and major shareholders have a substantial interest amounted toNZ$338,499 (2020:NZ$328,629)."
Curious on why the Board thinks the NZ institute for minerals to materials research is "a major group". Interesting that the company has to send a tonne of ore to Greymouth for testwork.
Otherwise, ho hum, which is to be expected as it only covers activities to March end
Last edited by haewai; 30-06-2021 at 02:33 PM.
-
30-06-2021, 02:46 PM
#7384
Originally Posted by haewai
Gravy
"Payments for consulting services to companies in which directors and major shareholders have a substantial interest amounted toNZ$338,499 (2020:NZ$328,629)."
Curious on why the Board thinks the NZ institute for minerals to materials research is "a major group". Interesting that the company has to send a tonne of ore to Greymouth for testwork.
Otherwise, ho hum, which is to be expected as it only covers activities to March end
The 338k needs to be examined. If most of it is going to Terra Firma it is probably understandable. If it is to Matt Hill and Murray Stevens we need to know.
-
30-06-2021, 03:07 PM
#7385
It seems separate from the way the accounts record Hill's reimbursement, with only a small amount as consulting fees and the rest as development expenses, as was the case in all prior years. Worst case would be director interest in Terra Firma and lack cost competitiveness as a result.
-
30-06-2021, 05:39 PM
#7386
Can anyone identify what the $246,049 of Sundry, but unidentified Income relates to ?
Can't see anything in Cashflow Statement
As a mere 99.32% of ALL OPERATING INCOME for the 2021 year it would appear to warrant better disclosure - would it not ?
-
30-06-2021, 05:45 PM
#7387
-
30-06-2021, 05:48 PM
#7388
Originally Posted by nztx
Can anyone identify what the $246,049 of Sundry, but unidentified Income relates to ?
Can't see anything in Cashflow Statement
As a mere 99.32% of ALL OPERATING INCOME for the 2021 year it would appear to warrant better disclosure - would it not ?
Scratching my head on that one too. There is an increase of 244,745 in Stock on hand. Stockpiled ore perhaps? I don't see how that qualifies as Operating Cashflow
-
30-06-2021, 06:05 PM
#7389
Originally Posted by jonu
Scratching my head on that one too. There is an increase of 244,745 in Stock on hand. Stockpiled ore perhaps? I don't see how that qualifies as Operating Cashflow
If that's the case, increase in Ore on Hand isn't Revenue at all .. how did this one get past the Auditors ?
-
30-06-2021, 06:09 PM
#7390
Why have Sundry Receivables gone up, if there's no mainstream mining Revenue happening ?
Surely if there was sale of Mining based outputs, then that must be a mainstream activity revenue & not a sundry income ?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks