sharetrader
Page 849 of 936 FirstFirst ... 349749799839845846847848849850851852853859899 ... LastLast
Results 8,481 to 8,490 of 9358
  1. #8481
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    7,000

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snow Leopard View Post
    Why are they doing a 10 to 1 consolidation?
    It will still be a penny dreadful.

    I would have thought 100 to 1 or more would be a more sensible ratio.

    Too many unmarketable parcels if 100 to 1 consolidation .. many might jump out or lose interest

    100 for 1 would result in just short of 32 m shares on issue

    Go too fierce on a consolidation - it may reduce success chances on a CR
    forcing the company to find new homes in a placement issue instead if rights
    issue saw low uptake.

    How does between 2.0c & 3.0c look as a SP post consolidation for NTL ?

    ASX: just after 10 am Aust time 0.001 Buy 0.002 Sell

    How many will stay & how many will jump off on ASX with consolidation then prospect
    of a Cap Raise ?
    Last edited by nztx; 01-02-2023 at 12:36 PM.

  2. #8482
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Landyman View Post
    And no mention of delisting from ASX.

    Decent volumes again, giving lack of usual volume in NTL.
    Why would you delist from the ASX when you are doing a capital raise. Completely alienate a large chunk of your shareholder base. That would not be that sensible I would have thought.

  3. #8483
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,862

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nztx View Post
    Too many unmarketable parcels if 100 to 1 consolidation ....
    "Issuers of securities on the NZX enforce their own minimum holding requirements. Where an issuer has not specified a Minimum Holding, then there is no required minimum."

    1000 @ $0.003 is as unmarketable as 10 @ $0.30.
    om mani peme hum

  4. #8484
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    7,000

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snow Leopard View Post
    "Issuers of securities on the NZX enforce their own minimum holding requirements. Where an issuer has not specified a Minimum Holding, then there is no required minimum."

    1000 @ $0.003 is as unmarketable as 10 @ $0.30.

    always the cost of maintaining small holdings on the share register with reports communications etc
    comes into play, especially with small companies with limited resources.

    Who knows .. I suggested a consolidation was on the cards with NTL some time ago, looking at smaller
    uneconomic holdings may well be another move in future, which makes sense

  5. #8485
    Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Everywhere
    Posts
    7,000

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nztx View Post
    always the cost of maintaining small holdings on the share register with reports communications etc
    comes into play, especially with small companies with limited resources.

    Who knows .. I suggested a consolidation was on the cards with NTL some time ago, looking at smaller
    uneconomic holdings may well be another move in future, which makes sense

    How many smaller parcels will NTL continue to tolerate on their share registry until they decide to
    do a clean up ?

  6. #8486
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    Why would you delist from the ASX when you are doing a capital raise. Completely alienate a large chunk of your shareholder base. That would not be that sensible I would have thought.
    NTL I understand could delist shares from the ASX and automatically relist the same number on the NZX subject to ASX approval. This has been done the other way round recently with DGL. I agree not the best time to do it while doing a capital raise but I hope the Board will review at the Aussie Rights uptake and overall split between the two exchanges and seriously consider the benefit in having the dual listing.

  7. #8487
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Is it a bit ironic that they want us to believe them when they say they will produce gold in H2 and be cash flow positive late in 2023 but can’t even get the rights offer out when they say they will 🤔

  8. #8488
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Super Rugby champion country
    Posts
    750

    Default

    THe olde share portfolio was looking good this morning on NTL - share consolidation in place - always knew NTL would be a 10x bagger - hahahah

  9. #8489
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,456

    Default

    NTL in a T Halt in Aust until Thursday , why not N Z ?

  10. #8490
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whatsup View Post
    NTL in a T Halt in Aust until Thursday , why not N Z ?
    Halted in NZX
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •