-
24-03-2024, 10:56 AM
#9271
Member
Originally Posted by Daytr
OK, we have been arguing at cross purposes.
As I said at the start according to the announcement they will be producing a 1% concentrate. I.e 1kg per ton.
Nope - 1kg per tonne is 0.1%. Oh good I see you have corrected that. I'll now answer the next post.
Last edited by Paint it Black; 24-03-2024 at 10:58 AM.
-
24-03-2024, 11:14 AM
#9272
Member
Originally Posted by Daytr
Sorry my math there is wrong. It should be 0.1 of a percent. I.e 1kg per 1000kgs.
Anyway I have no issue with what is stated as the concentrate from the announcement in 2019.
Where I am struggling is that you are saying it's then being reconcentrated to produce 10kg per ton concentrate.
Where has the company stated this?
Can't recall myself or the company saying that. Can you assist? The bottom line is that by combining the published JORC and concentrate assay results one can calculate that by using a concentrator NTL can reduce the quantity of material needing to be transported to 1% of the ore quantity if it was transported from the the mine untreated.
-
24-03-2024, 11:14 AM
#9273
Last edited by Daytr; 24-03-2024 at 11:36 AM.
-
24-03-2024, 11:48 AM
#9274
Originally Posted by Paint it Black
You have possibly misunderstood what I am saying about concentration levels. My post last July referred to reducing the volume of ore 100 times eg a 6 tonne truck delivery would be reduced to 60 kg. Not then expensive at all to transport to Reefton (or wherever) with a ute.
Originally Posted by Paint it Black
Can't recall myself or the company saying that. Can you assist? The bottom line is that by combining the published JORC and concentrate assay results one can calculate that by using a concentrator NTL can reduce the quantity of material needing to be transported to 1% of the ore quantity if it was transported from the the mine untreated.
We have been talking cross purposes, which is probably my fault.
We started talking about the grade of the concentrate produced, not the reduction of ore volume created by the concentrator.
But anyway, I agree the Federation mining option could be viable with that sort of concentrate.
And apologies for the rigamarole
Cheers
Last edited by Daytr; 24-03-2024 at 04:33 PM.
-
24-03-2024, 06:31 PM
#9275
Member
Originally Posted by Daytr
We have been talking cross purposes, which is probably my fault.
We started talking about the grade of the concentrate produced, not the reduction of ore volume created by the concentrator.
But anyway, I agree the Federation mining option could be viable with that sort of concentrate.
And apologies for the rigamarole
Cheers
No worries and cheers. It would be great hear in the near future that Jonu and Co are continuing to pursue the concentrator option. To me it's a game changer especially as it would nullify the protestor's main gripe of truck movements along the existing narrow road and bridge.
-
24-03-2024, 07:17 PM
#9276
Bearing in mind there is already a low limit on traffic movements imposed on NTL by the regional council, the protesting trolls should get back under the bridge!
-
25-03-2024, 07:10 PM
#9277
Seems furore around sail boats and Hector Dolphins has fired up the politicians from the Prime Ministerdown …..far too much red tape and bureaucracy holding the economy back and stuffing the country …..they going to get rid of that
No need to debate it now …just do it ….good for NTL …..we got to get that gold out for the country’s economic state no matter what
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
25-03-2024, 08:10 PM
#9278
Member
Originally Posted by winner69
Seems furore around sail boats and Hector Dolphins has fired up the politicians from the Prime Ministerdown …..far too much red tape and bureaucracy holding the economy back and stuffing the country …..they going to get rid of that
No need to debate it now …just do it ….good for NTL …..we got to get that gold out for the country’s economic state no matter what
Exactly. It is very concerning that SailGP needed iwi approval to race at Lyttelton before DOC would give their consent. It's even worse than co governance! Same thing is happening at Port of Tauranga with local iwi delaying NZ's economic recovery. The system needs a massive shake up.
-
25-03-2024, 08:30 PM
#9279
I think we need to acknowledge something really important. Fundamentally important for shareholders especially.
This is going nowhere until NTL practically demonstrates it's ability to mine real gold and sell it (#1), make a profit from selling real gold (#2), sustain mining and sales, at a profit (#3). There's so many profitable gold minors listed that are a better choice right now, it doesn't make sense to put too much, or anything possibly, into something that chins none of these bars.
I'm not saying that they won't achieve these three goals, but right now there's no evidence to inspire investors in any of them. In fact there's still barriers to #1, that have material uncertainty attached to it. Vault that hurdle and I think substantial investors may start to reconsider.
JMHO.
-
25-03-2024, 08:36 PM
#9280
Member
Originally Posted by Paint it Black
Exactly. It is very concerning that SailGP needed iwi approval to race at Lyttelton before DOC would give their consent. It's even worse than co governance! Same thing is happening at Port of Tauranga with local iwi delaying NZ's economic recovery. The system needs a massive shake up.
Off NTL topic but this sort of crap has been going on for years. We must be the laughing stock in other countries!!
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/taniwh...%20of%20Tainui
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks