sharetrader
Page 100 of 106 FirstFirst ... 509096979899100101102103104 ... LastLast
Results 991 to 1,000 of 1053
  1. #991
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    184

    Default

    ComCom does it again. Good ole ComCom doesn't want investment in NZ companies.

    www.nzx.com/companies/VCT/announcements/256981

  2. #992
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    rural canterbury
    Posts
    1,357

    Default

    ComCom's process for decision making is pretty robust though, hard to argue with, and it consults very widely: "On 23 June the Commission released a further process update paper, and a number of expert reports written for the Commission on the choice of the WACC percentile. The reports were prepared by a number of expert advisers and firms engaged by the Commission: Professor Ingo Vogelsang of Boston University, Professor Julian Franks of the London Business School, Associate Professor Martin Lally of Victoria University of Wellington, European economic consulting firm Oxera, and the Australian consultancy Economic Insights"

    discl: small holdings in regulated companies

  3. #993
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAYAY View Post
    ComCom does it again. Good ole ComCom doesn't want investment in NZ companies.

    www.nzx.com/companies/VCT/announcements/256981
    Not true - Vector has relentlessly revalued its assets up over the years so that it can keep charging up its prices. Meanwhile, it ploughs back bugger all into line upgrades and cries poverty even while it pays out big dividends. Typical monopoly which needs regulatory overseeing.

  4. #994
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    184

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by satan View Post
    ComCom's process for decision making is pretty robust though, hard to argue with, and it consults very widely: "On 23 June the Commission released a further process update paper, and a number of expert reports written for the Commission on the choice of the WACC percentile. The reports were prepared by a number of expert advisers and firms engaged by the Commission: Professor Ingo Vogelsang of Boston University, Professor Julian Franks of the London Business School, Associate Professor Martin Lally of Victoria University of Wellington, European economic consulting firm Oxera, and the Australian consultancy Economic Insights"

    discl: small holdings in regulated companies
    Ha ha, "expert advisers and firms engaged by the commission" says it all.
    The outcome depends on who chooses the "expert" advisers and firms.
    As any businessman will tell you you only engage the "expert advisers" that suit your purpose.

  5. #995
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    rural canterbury
    Posts
    1,357

    Default

    Yes, I guess that is true. Although I suppose the purpose of the Commission is to find a formula that ensures continued investment at the lowest price to the consumer?

  6. #996
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Not true - Vector has relentlessly revalued its assets up over the years so that it can keep charging up its prices. Meanwhile, it ploughs back bugger all into line upgrades and cries poverty even while it pays out big dividends. Typical monopoly which needs regulatory overseeing.
    revaluations have no impact on the regulated asset base. They may have in the past but not any more.

    I wonder if it is the time for the AECT to take this private. That way profits become irrelevant (for those in the AECT area) - ie. any 'profits' gets rebated back to consumers through a lower line charge.

  7. #997
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    rural canterbury
    Posts
    1,357

    Default

    From the point of view of AECT, which owns 75% of VCT, it's best if there is co-ownership outside AECT and prices are as low as possible?

  8. #998
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by satan View Post
    From the point of view of AECT, which owns 75% of VCT, it's best if there is co-ownership outside AECT and prices are as low as possible?
    Not sure. Higher profit is probably better as the beneficiary aren't the only customers of VCT. Higher profits are redistributed as dividends to beneficiary's, not to all customers which a lower prices would do.

  9. #999
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    rural canterbury
    Posts
    1,357

    Default

    That's probably right, and is why VCT complain about the Commission. I've held shares in VCT since 2009 as a very small part of a diversified portfolio. They are unspectacular but safe and the Commission is unlikely to ever change that in my opinion.

  10. #1000
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    interesting market reaction following the ComCom decision - SP up 2% (or 5 cents). Looks like the market is pleasantly surprised?

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •