sharetrader
Page 53 of 106 FirstFirst ... 34349505152535455565763103 ... LastLast
Results 521 to 530 of 1053
  1. #521
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    480

    Default

    Wow, there goes yesterdays gain !

    Comm/Commision stated that announcement after taking full consideration of recent govt announcement, hate to think what would have happened if there wasn't the govt announcement on Monday.

  2. #522
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    161

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by whatsup

    WOW, just imagine what the Comm Comm will do to Auck Airport( On the abuse of a monopoly position situation).
    Heh, heh. This anno. has not gone unnoticed by holders of AIA. Being a member of the travelling public (and AIR holder), but not an AIA holder, bring it on, I say. Actually thought about buying VCT yesterday. Slow to react can be fortunate sometimes ... I guess Commerce Comm. are reminding everyone who the sheriff is, after apparent signs of weakness from the Govt. yesterday.

  3. #523
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,186

    Default

    VCT
    09/08/2006
    COMCOM

    REL: 1441 HRS Vector Limited

    COMCOM: VCT: Intention to declare control of Vector Limited published

    Intention to declare control of Vector Limited published

    The Commerce Commission has published its intention to declare control of the
    electricity distribution services supplied by Vector Limited.

    The Commission has found that Vector is overcharging industrial and
    commercial customers across its networks. Vector is also undercharging some
    residential customers, particularly the Auckland residential consumers who
    are the beneficiaries of Auckland Energy Consumer Trust, Vector's principal
    shareholder. By being undercharged, beneficiaries of the Trust are receiving
    an implicit dividend in addition to the normal shareholder dividend.

    The Commission considers that the disparity between customer classes is
    inefficient and can not be justified. The Commission also found that Vector
    is earning excessive revenues overall.

    Commerce Commission Chair Paula Rebstock says that the Commission's view is
    that:
    - Vector is overcharging some customers and undercharging others. The
    company is making different rates of return from its 21 different customer
    classes and these differences can not be justified. For example, during the
    2006/2007 year, Vector will earn a 54.4% rate of return on investment from
    one group of Northern business customers, while it earns only a 4.6% rate of
    return from Auckland residential customers.
    - Vector is earning excess revenues. The Commission's preliminary
    estimate is that, during the next two years, Vector will earn between $13
    million and $75 million in excess revenue per annum. To bring its returns to
    a normal level, the Commission estimates Vector would need to reduce its
    charges between 2% and 11% for each of the next two years. (Vector's
    distribution charges comprise around 20 to 40% of the customer's power bill.)

    Ms Rebstock says that the Commission has given full regard to the Government
    Policy Statement issued on Monday.

    "The Commission is committed to ensuring that there is effective investment
    in New Zealand's basic infrastructure and our regulatory approach takes full
    account of appropriate infrastructure investment incentives for lines
    businesses," says Ms Rebstock.

    "The Commission considers that Vector's actions are not consistent with the
    purpose of Part 4A of the Commerce Act, nor with the objectives of the
    Government Policy Statement.

    "Vector is focussing on the short term interests of particular classes of
    customers who are also beneficiaries of its major shareholder, the Auckland
    Electricity Consumers Trust. Such customers receive a direct dividend and an
    additional implicit dividend by being undercharged themselves.

    "The Commission's view at this time is that a declaration of control would be
    in the long-term interest of consumers.

    "Overcharging and undercharging are both inefficient - that is, they are
    harmful to the New Zealand economy," Ms Rebstock says.

    "Vector is aware of the imbalances across its customer classes and has had
    ample opportunity to improve the situation. Instead, during the time that
    Vector has been aware of the imbalances, the situation has deteriorated
    further for many groups of consumers.

    "Vector is not making sufficient progress in redressing the overcharging of
    some customers and reducing its excessive revenues, and as a result the
    Commission has moved to this intention to declare control.

    "These are very serious issues," says Ms Rebstock. "Vector is only able to
    overcharge some customers and undercharge others by abusing its monopoly
    power."

    Ms Rebstock said that Vector was in discussions with the Commission about an
    administrative settlement, which is an alternative to control. She said the
    release of the Commission's paper will assist Vector to focus on the long
    term interest of all its consumers, and will add transparency to the process
    of removing overcharging.




    Hopefully Airpor

  4. #524
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    480

    Default

    Pity I'm going to take a double hit, once as a shareholder, and again as a consumer in the "undercharged" area (AECT)

    As an aside, (as I operate through a company) if my company sold some of its trading shares to me, at below market value, then wouldn't the IRD want to tax my "additional implied dividend" ???

  5. #525
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    I am starting to think that my TPW shares are not as safe as i anticipated. What will the crazy bastards meddle with next. AIA,TEL, CEN,TPW. Time for a rethink. Hope you sold heaps KIWI no one has a system that will forecast that. macdunk

  6. #526
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Posts
    337

    Default

    Thankfully I got out of this share recently.

    "The Commerce Commission has published its intention to declare control of the electricity distribution services supplied by Vector Limited".

    Unbelievable, but not surprising with this government.

    Paddie

  7. #527
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    london, , United Kingdom.
    Posts
    1,056

    Default

    Does this mean that the Labour Govt and the ComCom are going to have an all out battle on the direction that regulation is going to take in the NZ market place.

    The Govt needs to clarify the situation and urgently.
    Toddy

  8. #528
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    43

    Default

    I thought this was a free market economy rather than a dictatorship!
    There goes my pension investment hopes.
    Why don't the govt just nationalise things if they want control rather than just interfering with the market forces? Rather that than allowing householders and investors to invest, and then (just before the first results come out) they take over control!!!
    This has dumbfounded me, I really have lost incentive to take part in a game where the goal posts are moved by the referee. Bit like the Aussie league refs decisions on the Warriors!! A little one sided.
    Perhaps the conflict re govt saying "invest in infrastructure" vs "you are charging too much" can be sorted by the VCT management(?)

  9. #529
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    126

    Default

    its a very muddy ...dont like the look of the whole out look for the NZX...government involvement into equity markets dont mix well....
    Have stuck to export stocks SOE is looking good.

  10. #530
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    161

    Default

    I hope you guys were equally offended with Govt's treatment of TEL? The principles involved (property rights, etc) are exactly the same.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •