sharetrader
Page 58 of 120 FirstFirst ... 84854555657585960616268108 ... LastLast
Results 571 to 580 of 1194

Thread: SeaDragon

  1. #571
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    10.4m shares on the offer side at 1.5c to sell,

    97k shares on the bid side at 1.4c to buy,

    3 big sellers lining up one after the other to feed any buyer at 1.5c.

    Interesting.

  2. #572
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Wainui, New Zealand.
    Posts
    924

    Default

    ENERAL: SEA: Directors sell shares on undertakings to Takeovers Panel 01:26p.m.
    SEA
    26/01/2016 13:26
    GENERAL
    NOT PRICE SENSITIVE
    REL: 1326 HRS SeaDragon Limited

    GENERAL: SEA: Directors sell shares on undertakings to Takeovers Panel

    NZX / MEDIA RELEASE 26
    January 2016

    Directors sell shares on undertakings to Takeovers Panel

    SeaDragon Limited (NZX:SEA) has received a number of enquiries from
    shareholders regarding the sale of relatively small parcels of shares by
    entities associated with Ross Keeley (former CEO and former director) and
    Stuart Macintosh (current director). SeaDragon is not involved in those
    transactions. Mr Keeley and Mr Macintosh have advised the company that the
    Takeovers Panel has required the sale of approximately 7.8 million shares
    that were acquired in the rights offer process completed late last year, due
    to an inadvertent breach of the Takeovers Code. Mr Keeley has also advised
    the company that he has sold a small number of SeaDragon shares to realise
    cash to invest in his other business interests.

    Both Mr Keeley and Mr Macintosh have confirmed their on-going commitment to
    SeaDragon and they have advised that they will both retain ownership
    interests in SeaDragon following these share sales. Any further enquiries
    regarding these transactions should be directed to either Mr Keeley or Mr
    Macintosh rather than to SeaDragon.

  3. #573
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ari View Post
    ENERAL: SEA: Directors sell shares on undertakings to Takeovers Panel 01:26p.m.
    SEA
    26/01/2016 13:26
    GENERAL
    NOT PRICE SENSITIVE

    REL: 1326 HRS SeaDragon Limited

    GENERAL: SEA: Directors sell shares on undertakings to Takeovers Panel

    NZX / MEDIA RELEASE 26
    January 2016

    Directors sell shares on undertakings to Takeovers Panel
    Always find it interesting what is and isn't considered price sensitive - surely the requirement to dump 7.8m shares might have a price impact???

  4. #574
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apathy View Post
    Always find it interesting what is and isn't considered price sensitive - surely the requirement to dump 7.8m shares might have a price impact???
    Stranger still why the number of shares required to be sold are not individually stated for each director?

    Mr Keeley states he sold a small number of shares to raise funds for his other investments - how many shares are small? $100,000 shares here = 7m shares!

  5. #575
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Stranger still why the number of shares required to be sold are not individually stated for each director?

    Mr Keeley states he sold a small number of shares to raise funds for his other investments - how many shares are small? $100,000 shares here = 7m shares!
    Your comments are typically mischievous Balance.......... https://www.nzx.com/companies/SEA/announcements/273993

    Stuart and Ross both made their continuing support for SeaDragon very clear publicly back in November - well, it appears to me that they did.

    I'm sure Ross was referring to the number of shares he still holds when he mentioned about selling 7m. And he's right - it was a small number.

    Now that's all been cleared up - I suppose you'll now be clamouring to buy back in?

  6. #576
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dentie View Post
    Thankfully, SNK are now recovering - let's hope SEA don't have to go through what SNK went through!!
    The answer to your question me ole Dentie is the same as to the above - is SNK really recovering? Trading at an old time weekly low of 86c vs its high point of $4.00 and the $2.40 of volume exit by its promoters?

  7. #577
    Membaa
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,322

    Default

    http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/seadrag...0Last%2520Call

    With the 11m+ overhang Ask at $.015 it's hard to see this going anywhere +ve anytime soon. You'd think the Directors would have a more efficient method to exit their shares without hobbling the ordinary shareholder? Surely this will go lower and pull down the Asks if they want out so badly.

  8. #578
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baa_Baa View Post
    . You'd think the Directors would have a more efficient method to exit their shares without hobbling the ordinary shareholder? Surely this will go lower and pull down the Asks if they want out so badly.
    agree - off market transfer to other enthusiastic directors.

  9. #579
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dentie View Post
    Stuart and Ross both made their continuing support for SeaDragon very clear publicly back in November - well, it appears to me that they did.
    That is irrelevant PR jibberish - what else would you expect them to say.... apart from... "...can the last one out remember to turn the lights off...."

  10. #580
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    The answer to your question me ole Dentie is the same as to the above - is SNK really recovering? Trading at an old time weekly low of 86c vs its high point of $4.00 and the $2.40 of volume exit by its promoters?
    Those two things at the end of my sentence are exclamation marks me ole Balance ...NOT question marks.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •