Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
Looks about right. Though funny that Wynyard didn't disclose the name of the customer (they normally would, unless the client does not want to be named). But than ... why is the client afterwards running to the press? Looks like a nice little communications break down - or a leak in the sheriff's office (which would be sort of concerning).
If the client doesn't want confidentality and Wynyard doesn't have an embargo on their name being used then there is no issue really. Might just be the status quo with Wynyard to stamp "confidential" on it, unless stated otherwise.