sharetrader
Page 6 of 205 FirstFirst ... 23456789101656106 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 2042
  1. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    571

  2. #52
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    571

    Default

    The community is by its nature slow to adapt - out of necessity due to the amount of testing that goes on before hand. Given this is the product being adopted from the center outwards, and they've just made the switch, with Palantir teams setting up to push the product into wider government, with endorsement from core Intel agencies. Its the same in the UK. The team has had a rollout plan in place for several years longer than Wynyard, an ear into the core groups, has already rolled out, and has massive amounts of capital behind them.
    I really struggle to understand who their market is.

  3. #53
    The Good Banksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Banks Peninsula
    Posts
    516

    Default

    ......at least Greenbour can't sabotage this one!
    You might need to retract this comment moosie

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    571

    Default

    Not yet, but I would imagine any unit with an intel arm would go off the successful recommendation and rollout from the core. Think about intel as being a concentric series of rings; NZSIS, GCSB, NAB (core), then, Police, Defence (sometimes in the core sometimes out depending on investigation), then Customs, Immigration, IRD, then ones like Fisheries on the outer. You're not going to get very far going inwards through that ring from the outside, you've got to capture the core and then move outwards, allowing integration into central data-sets by those more external rings, while still having access controls to limit information. The internal rings already use a system, and it aint Wynyard.

    Its not just the software, but also the development of algorithms that allow successful extraction of the specific data trends from meta-data. So any group thats had an opportunity to test on 1. multiple population types, and 2. multiple agency requirements is going to have a greater variety of algorithms on offer, and have an easier time customising them.

  5. #55
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,074

    Default

    not for me , would have preferref to see the most profitabe part transferred to wynyard
    one step ahead of the herd

  6. #56
    The Good Banksie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Banks Peninsula
    Posts
    516

    Default

    Thanks Sparky.

    I think Wynyard can be a good company, but I am not sure it is worth the risk of getting in at IPO time. I will probably just wait and see on this one...which is a real pity cos it was the one IPO I had an opportunity to take part in.

  7. #57
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    3,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyTheClown View Post
    From NBR online (paid content)
    Thanks Sparky

    Dont think this changes anything. They have capitalised the cost of a product and as it doesn't have any revenue yet, there is the potential they will have to right it off. This investment was never going to be valued of its NTA, it will be valued off its revenues, growth profile and costs. The uncertainty on revenue and growth on these two products is the same as before.

    The only question it does raise is why their auditors let them capitalise it in the first place. The tax advisors probably outsmarted the auditors : the only benefit in capitalising (that I'm aware of) is that when it does get written off (through depreciation), the benefit of that will flow to new shareholders where if it was deducted up front, the tax losses would potentially be forfeited in the capital raising.
    Free delivery worldwide with Book Depository http://www.bookdepository.co.uk

  8. #58
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Banksie View Post
    Thanks Sparky.

    I think Wynyard can be a good company, but I am not sure it is worth the risk of getting in at IPO time. I will probably just wait and see on this one...which is a real pity cos it was the one IPO I had an opportunity to take part in.
    I feel much the same.Craigs rang me this morning,but I decided to leave it.
    Having to take up EBO issue,and possibily Synlait means funds are short,and Jade has had a bit of a checked history..
    Last edited by percy; 14-06-2013 at 03:30 PM.

  9. #59
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moosie_900 View Post
    Checkered history? Do tell...
    Great gunna's,guna do this ,guna do that.Peter Hoskyns jumped ship,Gill Simpson was guna do this guna do that.Took on huge number of staff.
    Sponsored Jade stadium here in ChCh.Guna take over the world.Ruth Richardson onboard.Staff laid off.Listing of Jade put off.Simpson loses control as the whole lot didn't do this,didn't do that."Trouble at mill">
    Ex Reserve Bank Dr,Rod Carr brought on board.Dr.Carr leaves to run the university.
    etc.etc.
    ps.RR has a proven history of destroying shareholders wealth.Refer Tainted Directors thread.
    Last edited by percy; 14-06-2013 at 05:45 PM.

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    620

    Default

    RR has interestingly been left off the Wynyard board.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •