-
01-11-2019, 10:28 AM
#1101
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
It is always wrong to buy stock based on the current holdings (with the exception of following a diversification strategy). Averaging up (as a strategy) is as much nonsensical as averaging down.
It is easy to buy an up-trending stock (averaging up) too dear (just look at all the hype peaks in our well known growth stocks - e.g. talk with the people averaging up ATM at $17) and it can be amazing efficient to "average down" on a stock which just reached their all time low (buying Serko below 30 cents was clearly clever, no matter how many shares the SH already owned.
The only thing which does matter is the future development of the stock you are buying ... and this is absolutely uncorrelated to the amount of shares you already hold - and it always lies in the mist of the future ;
Only with the benefit of hindsight will we be able to assess whether "averaging up" Serko at this stage will be a clever idea ... but I can predict that the outcome (whatever it is) will be absolutely uncorrelated to whether the buyer was averaging up, down or just buying new ...
There's a simple saying you hear and that's 'never buy into a down trend'. Even if it's "the best stock ever". It's a pretty good rule if you're anti losing money. (also known as don't buy more of a bad story)
-
01-11-2019, 10:39 AM
#1102
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
01-11-2019, 10:50 AM
#1103
Originally Posted by Balance
In fact, there's everything wrong with averaging down as a strategy (you are buying more and more of a bad story) and everything right with averaging up (you are buying more and more of a good story).
Agree.
Add to your winners,sell your losers.
Whenever I want to add to my strongest shares, I find the funds from selling my weakest shares.
I also prefer adding to companies I already hold.
However I have also done very well adding to "strong conviction" shares such as HGH in downtrends,Buying any share in a down trend, you must understand the company better than "the market" or "loud posters" on ST..lol.
Last edited by percy; 01-11-2019 at 10:52 AM.
-
01-11-2019, 10:51 AM
#1104
Originally Posted by Left field
Mmmm interesting, but I beg to differ.
I decide on a company (stock) to add to my portfolio (using a mix of TA and FA,) and then purchase in increments over time. I never buy a holding all at one time just in case I've timed the market wrongly.
I tend to buy only up trending stocks that are outperforming the NZX50 and show signs of continuing to do so. I buy more as the SP increases (averaging up,) all the while ensuring my average holding price is well below the current market average (giving me what I call is my protective moat.)
On very rare occasions I have even averaged down when I perceived the market had irrationally marked down a share that I owned. This tactic worked well for me with both XRO and ATM.
JMHO. DYOR and be accountable for your own decisions.
I like your strategy - makes sense. Most my big wins have been from averaging down...
-
01-11-2019, 11:46 AM
#1105
I actually had a quick look through my portfolio and the only share I've averaged down in the last 10 years was actually Serko which I have bought at IPO $1.10 (my biggest parcel) then at 76c and 35c.
I have different strategies for different companies. I own quite a few speculative stocks where I start really small and then add on if I like the message through SPPs or on market (like ATM, GNX.ASX, XTE.ASX). Some go bust but then the losses are small.
-
01-11-2019, 12:46 PM
#1106
Originally Posted by Timesurfer
Likely to drift down as people cash up to buy cheaper one would guess - depends if the instos are keen to keep accumulating or are happy to sit back for a bargain.
Probably won't happen that way, as they may miss out on cheaper ones due to following as per SPP docs :
"If Serko receives applications in excess of NZ$5.0 million, it will scale back all applications on a proportionate basis in accordance with the number of Serko Shares held by the Applicant (or, in the case of an application made by a Custodian, the relevant beneficial owner(s) named in the schedule submitted with the Application Form) on the Record Date. The board of Serko believes this is the most equitable manner in which to deal with applications in excess of the funds required under the SPP."
-
01-11-2019, 01:21 PM
#1107
Originally Posted by sb9
Probably won't happen that way, as they may miss out on cheaper ones due to following as per SPP docs :
"If Serko receives applications in excess of NZ$5.0 million, it will scale back all applications on a proportionate basis in accordance with the number of Serko Shares held by the Applicant (or, in the case of an application made by a Custodian, the relevant beneficial owner(s) named in the schedule submitted with the Application Form) on the Record Date. The board of Serko believes this is the most equitable manner in which to deal with applications in excess of the funds required under the SPP."
Wouldn't it be great if some holders sell shares now in the hope to pick up some cheap ones in the SPP but then miss out and have to buy back on market!? Even more of an incentive for anyone holding to apply for the full 15k.
-
01-11-2019, 01:29 PM
#1108
I'll be going for my full entitlement....
-
01-11-2019, 01:53 PM
#1109
Originally Posted by silu
Wouldn't it be great if some holders sell shares now in the hope to pick up some cheap ones in the SPP but then miss out and have to buy back on market!? Even more of an incentive for anyone holding to apply for the full 15k.
Its a good bait they put in for existing shareholders, may see some selling by retail holders after SPP shares are allocated.
-
01-11-2019, 01:53 PM
#1110
Originally Posted by Left field
I'll be going for my full entitlement....
Same here, making room for funds over next week or so.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks