I'm also underwhelmed and will vote "no" when the time comes.
Why are NZ boards such wimps when it comes to takeover negotiations?
I'm not at all happy with the clause in the agreement that allows Ampol to have another bid in the event that a competing offer emerges. The Z board should not have allowed this clause. It is tantamount to an admission that Ampol hasn't made its best offer and won't do so unless a rival bid emerges.
I think such clauses should be specifically excluded by the takeovers legislation.
Z should have told Ampol to put their best price on the table now ie the price that they wouldn't go above in any circumstances - that way there wouldn't be a need for an option to rebid
Bookmarks