sharetrader
Page 76 of 246 FirstFirst ... 266672737475767778798086126176 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 760 of 2458
  1. #751
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldstein View Post
    The point is that unless National had agreement from the other parties it was always going to become a political football. There are some things that are bigger than a single political party. What did National think was going to happen? Once the SOEs are sold, job done?
    But surely that is the purpose of the election. Under MMP, you are never going to get 75% (or 66% or whatever special vote % you can think up). You cant stop a country progressing.

    On the same basis, Labour shouldn't be allowed to increase the retirement age to 67 if they get in as National oppose.

  2. #752
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Harvey Specter View Post
    But surely that is the purpose of the election. Under MMP, you are never going to get 75% (or 66% or whatever special vote % you can think up). You cant stop a country progressing.

    On the same basis, Labour shouldn't be allowed to increase the retirement age to 67 if they get in as National oppose.
    I'm not sure they are the same. Should one political party support making NZ a repbulic and then when in power assume they have the mandate to start the process, even when there maybe 50% of the country opposed?

    I undserstand what you are saying - just because we have MMP shouldn't stop the govt from doing effective governance.

    However, I stand by my claim that it is not the Green's fault that we are now in the situation we are in. They may have been a bit naive with the kiwi-power idea, and that was probably a knee-jerk reaction to the sales going ahead. I think this latest idea of the partial buy-back has more teeth. We shouldn't denegrate them for it. They are putting up alternatives.

  3. #753
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goldstein View Post
    I think this latest idea of the partial buy-back has more teeth. We shouldn't denegrate them for it. They are putting up alternatives.
    Without seeing the detail, it actually sounds quite reasonable.

    Compare it to Winston's, we'll just take the shares back.

  4. #754
    ****
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,621

    Default

    A much better turn out for the referendum than I certainly anticipated. The government has been sent a resounding NO! Key better start listening to the electorate or he is going to be turfed out at the next election. There is no way they should have raced to float these with this sort of uncertainty surrounding them. They have now damaged NZ's reputation for investment as it is likely these sales will be reversed. They thought they had a mandate to do this, clearly they didn't! http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11172228
    Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.

  5. #755
    ****
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,621

    Default

    I hear Key's Granny is up for sale, any offers considered. Phase two will be the grandkids... LOL
    Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.

  6. #756
    Guru Xerof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,005

    Default

    Problem with a non-binding referendum is a huge proportion of those who gave them the mandate in the first place don't bother to have a second, irrelevant cast of opinion. It's only the minority opposition who wish to shriek their protest, in vain. Well less than a million protest votes is no victory.

    lets see if they gain a mandate to buy it all back in 2014, AFTER they tell us what we need to sacrifice to do so.

    I have an open mind on the result, and will make sure my vote counts when it counts, not in some pathetic referendum
    Last edited by Xerof; 14-12-2013 at 11:33 AM.

  7. #757
    ****
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,621

    Default

    I would suggest a turn out of 1.3M says a lot of people care about the issue. That is a much bigger turn out than I think most expected. Sure asset sales may have been part of their election platform, however did they ever consider that they got elected for other reasons? i.e. lack of credible opposition at the time. (How the hell do you think Abbott ever got elected across the ditch.) The referendum maybe non-binding, however the next election isn't. I have lived & worked overseas for 20 years in commodity markets & I have seen the damage that having these sort of assets in the hands of corporations have done. They have been a disaster & it ends up that the tax payer ends up paying much higher power bills & then also ends up picking up the pieces of the trashed company left behind. It hasn't worked in Australia or the States, why do they think it is the right thing to do here These assets are owned by generations of Kiwis & should be retained by the future generations.
    Quote Originally Posted by Xerof View Post
    Problem with a non-binding referendum is a huge proportion of those who gave them the mandate in the first place don't bother to have a second, irrelevant cast of opinion. It's only the minority opposition who wish to shriek their protest, in vain. Well less than a million protest votes is no victory.

    lets see if they gain a mandate to buy it all back in 2014, AFTER they tell us what we need to sacrifice to do so.

    I have an open mind on the result, and will make sure my vote counts when it counts, not in some pathetic referendum
    Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.

  8. #758
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xerof View Post
    Problem with a non-binding referendum is a huge proportion of those who gave them the mandate in the first place don't bother to have a second, irrelevant cast of opinion. It's only the minority opposition who wish to shriek their protest, in vain. Well less than a million protest votes is no victory.

    lets see if they gain a mandate to buy it all back in 2014, AFTER they tell us what we need to sacrifice to do so.

    I have an open mind on the result, and will make sure my vote counts when it counts, not in some pathetic referendum
    With allude respect to those who believe it I don't think that they were given a 'mandate' in the last election ....the party stood on Issue 1 and Issue 2 and Issue 3 etc and Asset Sales .....with Asset Sales only one of several issues.

    How many people who voted National in the last election went along and voted saying to themselves 'I vote National today because I want the asset sales to happen' .....not many I would say

    Oh well it is just politics and putting spin on things to suit yourself.

  9. #759
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Was a bigger turnout than the last Auckland mayoral race (34% I believe) ......was Len given a mandate to stop cutting the grass on the berms
    Last edited by winner69; 14-12-2013 at 12:28 PM.

  10. #760
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by belgarion View Post
    Suggest you re-look at the number there mate ... Or perhaps re-sit that statistics paper you failed. There is no way that 900,000 votes against could have been put together without National voters voting NO too.
    Belg ...there was a YES vote in Epsom and Tamaki .....isn't that what really matters?

    Hey ....you live in Epsom don't you?

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •