sharetrader
Page 120 of 246 FirstFirst ... 2070110116117118119120121122123124130170220 ... LastLast
Results 1,191 to 1,200 of 2458
  1. #1191
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    702

    Default

    My sixpennyth is that Meridian will supply the 400MW, but no more. They will then sell the other 172MW on the open market. Making a bit both way. Why should Meridian support Tiwai more than is profitable for Meridian? Which brings me to the other option. Sell Manapouri to Tiwai. How much is it worth? Possibly even a dollar each share? Any other offers?

  2. #1192
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hamilton New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,251

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mouse View Post
    It's not me. I hate Cats as well.
    ..........

  3. #1193
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daytr View Post
    Yep agree & there aren't may things I agree on in regards Key.
    Being the cynic I am I wonder if he knows its a done deal to stay open bar the pricing?
    If it closes all of NZ barring Southland will be better off.
    If I'm Rio & I'm still making a buck in a very depressed ali market & the alternative is to pay a massive clean up bill, it stays open.
    Overall, IMO a closure would have a significant negative economic effects across the entire country. A significant surplus of cheap power would also wipe several hundreds of millions off generators and retailers nationwide, leading to job losses and lower rates of investment in infrastructure. Our balance of trade would also be negatively impacted.

    We'd all like to think that closure would be the golden egg for electricity consumers (and there would be some benefits), but I think overall it would be decidedly negative.

  4. #1194
    Senior Member warthog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    954

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaphod View Post
    Overall, IMO a closure would have a significant negative economic effects across the entire country. A significant surplus of cheap power would also wipe several hundreds of millions off generators and retailers nationwide, leading to job losses and lower rates of investment in infrastructure. Our balance of trade would also be negatively impacted.

    We'd all like to think that closure would be the golden egg for electricity consumers (and there would be some benefits), but I think overall it would be decidedly negative.
    So Rio Tinto are playing amateurs English, Joyce and co., as well as MEL?
    warthog ... muddy and smelly

  5. #1195
    Guru Xerof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,005

    Default

    Who owns Manapouri? Does it ONLY feed the smelter? how much would it take to tie it into the grid?

    don't answer - I remember this was discussed quite a while ago, so I'll trawl for it myself
    Last edited by Xerof; 01-07-2015 at 08:47 PM.

  6. #1196
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    702

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xerof View Post
    Who owns Manapouri? Does it ONLY feed the smelter? how much would it take to tie it into the grid?
    We have already used power from Manapouri when South Island lakes were a bit low. Tiwai shut off some of their pots. Plus I Think that Meridian would not have to pay for the Grid costs of connexion since we have Transpower?, for that. ATM we only need to connect the 172MW should Tiwai opt for only 400MW.
    Last edited by mouse; 01-07-2015 at 08:51 PM.

  7. #1197
    ****
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,603

    Default

    Really? They are selling the power already at a hugely discounted rate. Any money that the generators lost would end up in the hands of Joe Citizen.
    Power companies have been scalping NZers for too long. Job loses as well. What job losses? Money in peoples pockets will be spent & create jobs & a boost to the economy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Zaphod View Post
    Overall, IMO a closure would have a significant negative economic effects across the entire country. A significant surplus of cheap power would also wipe several hundreds of millions off generators and retailers nationwide, leading to job losses and lower rates of investment in infrastructure. Our balance of trade would also be negatively impacted.

    We'd all like to think that closure would be the golden egg for electricity consumers (and there would be some benefits), but I think overall it would be decidedly negative.
    Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.

  8. #1198
    Membaa
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daytr View Post
    Really? They are selling the power already at a hugely discounted rate. Any money that the generators lost would end up in the hands of Joe Citizen.
    Power companies have been scalping NZers for too long. Job loses as well. What job losses? Money in peoples pockets will be spent & create jobs & a boost to the economy.
    That's a heavy burden for the shareholders who thought they were buying a boring utility that had low growth prospects and would be sharing it's profits. We didn't ask the government to sell down it's 50%, we just bought it off them, and look what's happened, we've had to ride out massive uncertainty and capital value fluctuations that frankly only the government should have had to deal with. It's about time they dealt with them, by focusing on transmission charges which are rorting the system, as opposed to the gentailers who are fiercely competing on retail margins. imho.

  9. #1199
    ****
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,603

    Default

    BaaBaa, the risk in regards the smelter has always been there in fact I remember posting something about it when the government floated the assets. I agree though re the generators. The industry is generally heavily protected & stifles alternative energy generation such as solar.
    Hopefully you find my posts helpful, but in no way should they be construed as advice. Make your own decision.

  10. #1200
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,324

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daytr View Post
    Really? They are selling the power already at a hugely discounted rate. Any money that the generators lost would end up in the hands of Joe Citizen.
    Power companies have been scalping NZers for too long. Job loses as well. What job losses? Money in peoples pockets will be spent & create jobs & a boost to the economy.
    If you were suggesting that the underlying problem (if there is one) causing relatively high electricity pricing in this country would be resolved, then I would be all for it. However what you're advocating is to artificially lower the price by flooding the market with excess energy. That won't fix the issue, especially in the long term. All it will do is destroy the wealth of shareholders, including the taxpayer and give consumers a very short term fix.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •