sharetrader
Page 14 of 246 FirstFirst ... 41011121314151617182464114 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 2458
  1. #131
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,436

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moosie_900 View Post
    hope no one is looking to stag again, IRD sitting in wait for those fools again and to compare with the MRP IPO
    Huh? What's going to worry the IRD about a quick sale? Their only concern is whether tax is paid when due.

  2. #132
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,742

    Default

    First NZ Capital research here if anyone hasnt seen it https://www.firstnzcapital.co.nz/public/

  3. #133
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,435

    Default

    Have been studying various info on Aluminum smelters around the World. My reading of it is:
    # Currently there are plans for around 35 new aluminum smelters worldwide
    # 25 in Asia, 3 in Middle East, 4 in Europe /East Europe, 2 in Canada & 1 in Argentina
    # Total production for all those at full production would be around 16 million tonnes p.a.
    # Estimated electricity price in China & India is around USD 40/Mwh
    # construction cost of India/China is around 1/3 of the Western World
    # the average cost of electricity at the other planned smelters is around USD 20-25/Mwh
    # First NZ Capital estimates new electricity contract with Tiwai at USD 39.4/Mwh

    My conclusion is that, unless we get around 20% increase in aluminum prices and around 10% drop in FX for NZ$ against USD (both possible), Tiwai has no future. Shadbolt, prepare Southlanders for that happening, sooner rather than later.
    BUT, from my reading of it, it will have only minimal impact on Meridian, CEN & MRP. The Labour/Green threat is the real issue here.

    I really want to invest in Meridian. Think they have great assets, sustainable future dividends from very positive cashflow, but fear political changes.
    For me the question is, do I put my money faithfully into Meridian or do I start liqidating NZ assets and move them off-shore fearing a Cunliffe takeover ?
    Last edited by iceman; 28-09-2013 at 08:21 AM. Reason: spelling

  4. #134
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    187

    Default

    As Mr.Gaynor says the big gainers from these floats are Key's investment buddies.

    "The investment banks in charge of selling Mighty River had the potential to earn up to $1,333,334 each if they reached certain price and value targets.
    This time around the bankers will be able to earn only up to $750,000 if they reached certain price and value targets.. Commission fees are then paid on top of that...."

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=11128967


    Brian Gaynor, an executive director of Milford Asset Management, said initial public offers were a "gravy train" for the investment banks.
    "Is this too high? They are all too high."
    Gaynor said bankers were incentivised to get the highest price possible for the seller but there was little to ensure the price of the shares was not lower a year after the float.
    He said that while the Meridian float was bigger, the size of a float did not make much difference to its costs.
    "You are still having to go through the same process."
    The bankers and brokers involved in the deal will get paid after the sharemarket listing, set down for October 29, despite 40 per cent of the money not due to be paid until May 2015..."

    So, who has more incentive to alter the share price. Gaynor or the bankers? Looks like the latter to me.


  5. #135
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackCross View Post
    As Mr.Gaynor says the big gainers from these floats are Key's investment buddies.

    "
    And poor Gaynor doesn't fit into that eh ? I used to really like Gaynor's articles but recently he's gone really strange and I no longer put much weight on his comments. I was also very close to moving my retirement savings (those out of my day to day control) to his funds but belatedly decided not to because of what I regard as his recent change of tune !

  6. #136
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    And poor Gaynor doesn't fit into that eh ? I used to really like Gaynor's articles but recently he's gone really strange and I no longer put much weight on his comments. I was also very close to moving my retirement savings (those out of my day to day control) to his funds but belatedly decided not to because of what I regard as his recent change of tune !
    From what I have observed "The Iceman Self Managed Fund" [TISMF] would have out performed all NZ Funds,including Milford over the last couple of years.Should "TISMF" be able to retain Iceman as Fund manager, this out performance should continue into the foreseeable future.!
    Last edited by percy; 28-09-2013 at 07:17 AM.

  7. #137
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    3,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    First NZ Capital research here if anyone hasnt seen it https://www.firstnzcapital.co.nz/public/
    I think he was a MER employee till recently so he will have a lot of knowledge (bias?).

    The interesting thing out of the report is what is the correct metric to use - DCF or EV/EBIT (cash or profits)?

    I've been focusing on the cash/Dividends

  8. #138
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,435

    Default

    Thanks Joshuatree for posting this link. I hadn't read it. One incredible bit of info in it is that in 2006 Meridian had 365 full time staff and in 2013 they had 827. Sales volumes have been static during this period. Efficiency of Government owned companies right there for all to see !

  9. #139
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,074

    Default

    another thing is retail investors only pay 1.60 if institutions pay 1.80 then potential ipo opening price is 1.20 no wonder they dont want to pay anymore than 1.60 cause it designed to let retail investors make money?
    one step ahead of the herd

  10. #140
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    another thing is retail investors only pay 1.60 if institutions pay 1.80 then potential ipo opening price is 1.20 no wonder they dont want to pay anymore than 1.60 cause it designed to let retail investors make money?
    Don't know if it works like that bull.... I think the price will be $1 for both insots and retail investors but retail investors then pay $.60 for the second installment while instos pay $.80. So the opening price will still be $1.00. Because if you buy on market, regardless if you are retail or insto, you then pay the $.80 second installment.
    That is how I understand it anyway.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •