sharetrader
Page 73 of 246 FirstFirst ... 236369707172737475767783123173 ... LastLast
Results 721 to 730 of 2458
  1. #721
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobcat. View Post
    "BNY Mellon, a holding company for fund managers including Newton, said its related entities had sold 1.5 million Chorus shares on December 4, contributing to a drop in its stake from 7.5 to 6.3 per cent"

    At the very least I would say BNY Mellon would want to sell down to under 5%. A definite overhang.
    Bobcat,
    BNY Mellon is NOT the ultimate beneficial holder of the shares. They issue the Chorus ADR (Symbol: CHRYY), which enables trading in Chorus on the US markets. They hold the CNU shares as backing for the CHRYY they have issued (ratio 5 CNU to 1 CHRYY).
    So the reduction in their holding means that quite a few holders of those ADRs (probably mostly US fund managers diversifying internationally into 'safe' utilities in 'safe' jurisdictions) have sold their CHRYY causing BNY Mellon to cancel those ADRs and selling the CNUs no longer required.
    I doubt BNY Mellon makes any investment decisions here, they are mainly arbitrating and collecting fees for providing the service.

    I would think their holding in MELCA will be for a similar arrangement, though I could not find a Meridian ADR.
    Last edited by sideline; 06-12-2013 at 03:04 PM. Reason: thread mismatch

  2. #722
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by troyvdh View Post
    dear roger...you do have quite firm opinions..on a variety of issues ..well done ..so do I .

    However ...disclosure is a wonderful thing is it not...I believe that I have disclosed my holdings in the past....have you....cheers troy
    There you go. Disc don't hold Meridian and also arn't short but probably should be.

  3. #723
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,435

    Default

    While not directly related to Meridian, this http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=11168422
    is a good article from Gaynor suggesting Kiwibank should be partially floated rather than Genesis. He's got a valid point !
    But no doubt that will not happen. After implementing Anderton's idea creating Kiwibank, Cullen has now moved fulltime to NZ Post to completely finish it off !!!!
    Last edited by iceman; 07-12-2013 at 08:42 AM.

  4. #724
    Veteran novice
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    7,289

    Default

    Yes, Kiwibank's been an obvious candidate for privatisation. The most likely reason for not doing so is that the govt doesn't want to attract any more flak! Imagine the uproar from certain quarters - " the Aussies will gain control" - "Labour created it, now National's giving it away".

    No, they don't need that coming into election year!

  5. #725
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by belgarion View Post
    we see govt for what they are - poor managers of our national assets.
    So we should be glad they sold them then and got what at this stage looks to be a bloody good price for the Crown !

  6. #726
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    3,243

    Default

    Oram failed to take into account the tax the government will collect from the dividends received by the 49% holders.

    I also note that an overseas commentator stated that NZ now ranked below Pakistan for investing. All to do with political interference no doubt.

  7. #727
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    123

    Default

    Would that be the fund manager that purchased pretty much 8% of Meridian when it was at record high, and would be taking a bath now that it's low 90s? I can see why they wouldn't like our markets!

  8. #728
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by belgarion View Post
    Once again another ill-informed statement ... Rod Oram on the subject ...

    Worse, it is selling income-producing assets and reinvesting in non-income producing assets. Treasury estimates forgone dividends over the next five years will be $810m, while interest costs will be reduced by $780m. So the Government will be $30m worse off over five years because of the floats.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opin...-a-report-card

    And not just Rod either, even Treasury concluded the same thing!
    given low demand, there is a risk dividends will be lower, and if we didn't get the govt budget/debt under control, the interest rate could have gone up.

  9. #729
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    North Shore, Auckland , New Zealand.
    Posts
    452

    Default

    so the greens want to keep the next instalment. At least it's not another negative I suppose.
    Last edited by ScrappyO; 08-12-2013 at 06:19 PM.

  10. #730
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ScrappyO View Post
    so the greens want to keep the next instalment. At least it's not another negative I suppose.
    Have you got a link to that announcement?

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •