sharetrader
Page 28 of 148 FirstFirst ... 182425262728293031323878128 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 1478
  1. #271
    Member sharer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    321

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by axe View Post
    Why not hold all three? They are very diverse.

    The generation mix.
    The geographical split.
    The generation / retail split.
    I agree with your suggestion Axe, broadly for the three main reasons you list.
    Although i continue to disagree with the Nats program of asset sales, & still consider the false economic reasoning offered by Key etc wrong & wilfully stupid, the political fact was that they were determined to do the whole thing, our pathetic system of government meant there was no way to stop them, and by differing mechanisms in each of the three floats investors have achieved much better yields than any bank (or as far as i know industrial bonds now on the market) are offering in at least the next 5 years, so it makes simply pragmatic sense to invest in each of the three electricity floats, for varying reasons.

    How long to hold for is a separate calculation now for each of them. Their relative weighting in the portfolio also requires calculation, and willingness to rebalance sometimes.

    Disc: Now holding MRP, MEL, & GNE, and now working on my exit strategy (possibly medium-term) for each of them; considering longer term hold also possible (esp MEL).

  2. #272
    Member sharer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    321

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by axe View Post
    Why not hold all three? They are very diverse.

    The generation mix.
    The geographical split.
    The generation / retail split.
    I agree with your suggestion Axe, broadly for the three main reasons you list.
    Although i continue to disagree with the Nats program of asset sales, & still consider the false economic reasoning offered by Key etc wrong & wilfully stupid, the political fact was that they were determined to do the whole thing, our pathetic system of government meant there was no way to stop them, and by differing mechanisms in each of the three floats investors have achieved much better yields than any bank (or as far as i know industrial bonds now on the market) are offering in at least the next 5 years, so it makes simply pragmatic sense to invest in each of the three electricity floats, for varying reasons.

    How long to hold for is a separate calculation now for each of them. Their relative weighting in the portfolio also requires calculation, and willingness to rebalance sometimes.

    Disc: Now holding MRP, MEL, & GNE, and now working on my exit strategy (possibly medium-term) for each of them; considering longer term hold also possible (esp MEL).

  3. #273
    Member sharer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    321

    Default

    sorry about duplication, seems due to site malfunction. Now i can't delete it ...

  4. #274
    Ignorant. Just ignorant.
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Wrong Side of the Tracks
    Posts
    1,595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by axe View Post
    Why not hold all three? They are very diverse.

    The generation mix.
    The geographical split.
    The generation / retail split.
    I do (or will) hold all three, as well as TPW, KCE, and CEN, in rough relationship to their generating capacity.

    The strategy is based on the assumption that the electricity market will turn a profit and pay me a dividend.

    And on the assumption that if one company has a bad year, another company will have a correspondingly good year. For example, low lake levels in Taupo with high lake levels in the South Island are good for MEL, but bad for MRP.

    Time will tell.

  5. #275
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    702

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GTM 3442 View Post
    I do (or will) hold all three, as well as TPW, KCE, and CEN, in rough relationship to their generating capacity.

    The strategy is based on the assumption that the electricity market will turn a profit and pay me a dividend.

    And on the assumption that if one company has a bad year, another company will have a correspondingly good year. For example, low lake levels in Taupo with high lake levels in the South Island are good for MEL, but bad for MRP.

    Time will tell.
    But if limited funds apply, as in my case, then you do have to pick winners and losers. The two best power companies seem to me to be Mighty River and Meridian. They provide a geographical spread of generation. Meridian is particularly brilliant due to having Manapouri which is very underutilized at present. Get rid of the smelter and sell the power to the highest bidder.

  6. #276
    Ignorant. Just ignorant.
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Wrong Side of the Tracks
    Posts
    1,595

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mouse View Post
    But if limited funds apply, as in my case, then you do have to pick winners and losers. The two best power companies seem to me to be Mighty River and Meridian. They provide a geographical spread of generation. Meridian is particularly brilliant due to having Manapouri which is very underutilized at present. Get rid of the smelter and sell the power to the highest bidder.
    Hi mouse,

    "Good things take time"

    Just because I have a strategy doesn't mean I have to implement it all at once!

    The smelter ? All that capacity from Manapouri suddenly available and looking for a home? Sounds like a recipe for a price war to me!

    Thank you very much, but no. Although I suspect that my strategy could leave me "well positioned". . ..
    Last edited by GTM 3442; 16-04-2014 at 05:37 PM.

  7. #277
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kerikeri
    Posts
    2,485

    Default

    Nice operational report by MRP this morning. And hopefully this weather system will start the replenishment of Lake Taupo.
    https://www.nzx.com/companies/MRP/announcements/249587

  8. #278
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    702

    Default

    Help Needed. I am a small investor, with 1,600 Mighty River shares, bought at $2.50 each, total $4,000.
    I also have 3,600 shares in Meridian, bought on hire purchase, $3,600 down and $1,800 in 12? months. But full dividends now. So the total cost really is $5,400.
    We then come to comparing apples and apples. Both are power companies. One lot of shares cost me $4,000. The other lot $5,400.
    Mighty River cost, $4,000. Dividend paid March 2014, $174.20 cash in the bank.
    Meridian, cost $5,400. Dividend paid April 2014, $136.44 cash in the bank.
    So. Meridian has cost more than Mighty River, yet the dividends are less. More Mysterious is the fact that MRP shares have lost value since their float, but Meridian have seen their share price increase.
    Snoopy, have you any ideas why? Or anyone else? Should I sell Meridian, at a profit, and Buy MRP? Or just float along?

  9. #279
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Both are now in an uptrend.[The trend is your friend].
    Sit back and watch your profits,and dividends grow.

  10. #280
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by percy View Post
    Both are now in an uptrend.[The trend is your friend].
    Sit back and watch your profits,and dividends grow.
    Are you saying mouse is well positioned ? I hold all 3 in fairly equal weighting and am happily holding for the long term, subject to Government policy changes of course.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •