Time to normalise the UDC figures for 2016 so they can be compared more directly with the likes of Heartland Bank.
Heartland in FY2016 had selling and administration expenses of $69.872m (Heartland FY2016 report 'Selling & Administration Expenses', note 5). UDC had total operating expenses of $31.623m (UDC Financial Statement 2016, note 4). That is a difference of $38.249m. The two are comparable in that they have a similarly sized loan book (UDC:$2,573.030m, Heartland $3,133.957m). If we add the operating cost difference figure onto the UDC cost structure, what would that do to the UDC operating margin on assets?
FY2016: ($107.233-$38.249+ $10.011)/$2,573.030 = 3.07%
Note: UDC do not have a branch network of their own, but operate through ANZ bank branches in New Zealand. The $10.011m added back represents the adding back of 'fees paid to related parties' (ANZ). These are part of the $38.249m 'extra operating expenses (calculated above, using figures from Financial Statements 2016, note 4). The $10.011m could be thought of as a contribution to the ANZ branch network that allows UDC to carry on business as normal. But what I am interested in is the difference in operating cost of a finance company with and without a branch network. So this $10.011m which largely reflects a 'branch network allowance payment' must be removed from my comparison.
This recent year trend in the underlying margin at UDC is
FY2016 3.07% FY2015 3.53% FY2014 3.37% FY2013 2.58%
SNOOPY
Bookmarks