-
19-07-2015, 04:06 PM
#1661
Originally Posted by Snoopy
Below is my assessment of the present value of Genesis's 31% holding in the Kupe gas field.
Year |
Kupe Gas |
Value |
Resource Depreciation |
Net |
|
(GJ) |
Received |
and Amortization |
Proceeds |
2015 |
6.5E06 |
$48,360,000 |
$23,018,794 |
$25,341,206 |
2016 |
5.3E06 |
$36,671,760 |
$21,407,478 |
$15,264,282 |
2017 |
6.1E06 |
$39,252,622 |
$19,908,955 |
$19,343,667 |
2018 |
6.1E06 |
$36,504,938 |
$18,515,328 |
$17,989,610 |
2019 |
5.3E06 |
$29,497,187 |
$17,219,255 |
$12,277,932 |
2020 |
5.3E06 |
$27,432,384 |
$16,013,907 |
$11,418,477 |
2021 |
5.3E06 |
$25,512,117 |
$0 |
$25,512,117 |
2022 |
5.3E06 |
$23,720,269 |
$0 |
$23,726,269 |
2023 |
5.3E06 |
$22,065,430 |
$0 |
$22,065,430 |
2024 |
5.3E06 |
$20,520,850 |
$0 |
$20,520,850 |
2025 |
5.3E06 |
$19,084,390 |
$0 |
$19,084,390 |
2026 |
5.3E06 |
$17,748,483 |
$0 |
$17,748,483 |
2027 |
5.3E06 |
$16,506,089 |
$0 |
$16,506,089 |
Total |
7.17E07 |
$362,882,518 |
$116,083,717 |
$246,798,801 |
PV per share |
|
|
|
$0.25 |
PV per share (tax paid) |
|
|
|
$0.18 |
That last figure on the right is the important one. Genesis's 31% share of Kupe means that every Genesis share today contains 18c of 'value' directly attributable to the equity holding that Genesis has in Kupe. Because that value is positive, we can conclude that Genesis is making money (not losing money) from the natural gas attributable to their shareholding in Kupe. 18c is the wholesale market value to Genesis. This wholesale gas can be resold, and Genesis can clip the ticket again on this.
The above is my estimate of the value of Kupe gas to Genesis Energy shareholders. But what about Kupe Oil? Oil and LPG condensate are bracketed together from a reporting perspective.
Year |
No. of Oil & LPG |
Oil Barrel |
Kupe Condensate |
Resource Depreciation |
Net |
|
Equiv barrels |
Price USD |
Revenue |
and Amortization |
Proceeds |
2015 |
60000 |
60 |
$55,384,615 |
$33,381,206 |
$22,003,409 |
2016 |
44000 |
60 |
$37,772,308 |
$31,044,522 |
$6,727,786 |
2017 |
44000 |
60 |
$35,128,246 |
$28,871,405 |
$6,256,841 |
2018 |
44000 |
60 |
$32,669,269 |
$26,850,407 |
$5,818,862 |
2019 |
42000 |
60 |
$29,001,401 |
$24,970,878 |
$4,030,523 |
2020 |
46000 |
60 |
$29,539,998 |
$23,222,917 |
$6,317,082 |
2021 |
44000 |
60 |
$26,277,755 |
|
$26,277,755 |
2022 |
44000 |
60 |
$24,438,312 |
|
$24,438,312 |
2023 |
42000 |
60 |
$21,694,556 |
|
$21,694,556 |
2024 |
44000 |
60 |
$21,136,696 |
|
$21,136,696 |
2025 |
46000 |
60 |
$20,550,633 |
|
$20,550,633 |
2026 |
44000 |
60 |
$18,281,129 |
|
$18,281,129 |
2027 |
42000 |
60 |
$16,228,636 |
|
Total |
5.86E06 |
|
$368,103,576 |
$168,431,335 |
$199,762,244 |
PV per share |
|
|
|
|
$0.20 |
PV per share (tax paid) |
|
|
|
|
$0.14 |
Notes:
1/ All dollar calculated amounts in the table are $NZ. USD oil prices are converted to NZD using $NZ1 = $US0.65.
2/ 'Discounted earnings flow factor' for subsequent years: (1-0.07)= 0.93
3/ No. of shares on issue for Genesis Energy: 1,000,000,000.
SNOOPY
Last edited by Snoopy; 14-11-2015 at 04:50 PM.
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
19-07-2015, 04:14 PM
#1662
Originally Posted by Snoopy
Doing a straight line non discounted cashflow would effectively mean the gas price is increasing year on year at the discount rate I am using: 7%! Do you really think wholesale gas prices will increase at a 7% compounding rate for twelve years?
SNOOPY
You asked for feedback on your calculations
What I have said is that I don't think energy prices will remain static over your 12 year forecast timeframe, gave you a few reasons why I think they will rise, and suggested your model should consider that. You asked for an idea of how, and I gave you a very simple one that offsets your "time value of money" (which I think is too steep @ 7%pa compounding in a 1-3% inflation targeted economy, that has run sub-1% for a number of years)
If you don't agree with my suggestion, that's fine. I really don't take it personally. Forums are a good way of discussing differing opinions and me learning something along the way. I have some GNE in my collection, and the more background info I can analyse the better my decisions will be
-
20-07-2015, 10:44 AM
#1663
Originally Posted by xafalcon
I can't multi-quote, don't know how.
Just click the icon on the bottom RH corner of each message you want to mulitquote. Unlike the 'Reply' and 'Reply with Quote' options, there is no english text to tell you what this icon does. Not sure why.
I suggest you straight-line the cashflow rather then decreasing over time as you outlined
Year |
Kupe Gas |
Value |
Resource Depreciation |
Net |
|
(GJ) |
Received |
and Amortization |
Proceeds |
2015 |
6.5E06 |
$48,360,000 |
$23,018,794 |
$25,341,206 |
2016 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$21,407,478 |
$18,024,522 |
2017 |
6.1E06 |
$45,384,000 |
$19,908,955 |
$25,475,045 |
2018 |
6.1E06 |
$45,384,000 |
$18,515,328 |
$26,868,672 |
2019 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$17,219,255 |
$22,212,745 |
2020 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$16,013,907 |
$23,418,093 |
2021 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$0 |
$39,432,000 |
2022 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$0 |
$39,432,000 |
2023 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$0 |
$39,432,000 |
2024 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$0 |
$39,432,000 |
2025 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$0 |
$39,432,000 |
2026 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$0 |
$39,432,000 |
2027 |
5.3E06 |
$39,432,000 |
$0 |
$39,432,000 |
Total |
7.17E07 |
$533,448,000 |
$116,083,717 |
$417,364,283 |
PV per share |
|
|
|
$0.42 |
PV per share (tax paid) |
|
|
|
$0.30 |
Originally Posted by xafalcon
You asked for feedback on your calculations
What I have said is that I don't think energy prices will remain static over your 12 year forecast timeframe, gave you a few reasons why I think they will rise, and suggested your model should consider that. You asked for an idea of how, and I gave you a very simple one that offsets your "time value of money" (which I think is too steep @ 7%pa compounding in a 1-3% inflation targeted economy, that has run sub-1% for a number of years)
Interesting POV on my time value of money discount factor. When I used 7%, I was bracing myself for a cascade of criticism for using such a low figure! Perhaps one thing I should have made clear is that my time value of money discount does not assume these future earnings flows are certain. I was also trying to build in some business execution risk. By this I mean some hardware failure on the Kupe platform that stops all field output for a period. Or some casatrophic failure that spills oil off the coast and closes the well for years, maybe permanently. I don't see the probability of such events as high, particularly the latter. However, particularly with the latter, and paying for environmental damage, the consequences could be very severe. Genesis would probably collapse and all shareholders funds could be lost under that scenario. So although unlikely, these possibilities do have to be considered in the form of a higher time value of money discount factor.
If you don't agree with my suggestion, that's fine. I really don't take it personally. Forums are a good way of discussing differing opinions and me learning something along the way. I have some GNE in my collection, and the more background info I can analyse the better my decisions will be
This isn't a question of agreeing or disagreeing. No one knows exactly what the future earning flows will be. It is usually a good idea to run different scenarios to put some boundaries on the range of possibilities. I ran with your suggestion on my model before I replied to you the first time. I didn't publish the result though, until now (see above). Perhaps my earnings assumptions, based on the future whoelsale price of gas being static , are too low? Perhaps your earnings assumptions, based on the future whoelsale price of gas rising 7% per year, are too high? Perhaps the real result will be somewhere between the two?
SNOOPY
Last edited by Snoopy; 14-11-2015 at 04:50 PM.
Reason: Corrected gas units (PJ to GJ)
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
21-07-2015, 03:39 PM
#1664
Originally Posted by Snoopy
Kupe Oil: Oil and LPG condensate are bracketed together from a reporting perspective.
Year |
No. of Oil & LPG |
Oil Barrel |
Kupe Condensate |
Resource Depreciation |
Net |
|
Equiv barrels |
Price USD |
Revenue |
and Amortization |
Proceeds |
2015 |
60000 |
60 |
$55,384,615 |
$33,381,206 |
$22,003,409 |
2016 |
44000 |
60 |
$37,772,308 |
$31,044,522 |
$6,727,786 |
2017 |
44000 |
60 |
$35,128,246 |
$28,871,405 |
$6,256,841 |
2018 |
44000 |
60 |
$32,669,269 |
$26,850,407 |
$5,818,862 |
2019 |
42000 |
60 |
$29,001,401 |
$24,970,878 |
$4,030,523 |
2020 |
46000 |
60 |
$29,539,998 |
$23,222,917 |
$6,317,082 |
2021 |
44000 |
60 |
$26,277,755 |
|
$26,277,755 |
2022 |
44000 |
60 |
$24,438,312 |
|
$24,438,312 |
2023 |
42000 |
60 |
$21,694,556 |
|
$21,694,556 |
2024 |
44000 |
60 |
$21,136,696 |
|
$21,136,696 |
2025 |
46000 |
60 |
$20,550,633 |
|
$20,550,633 |
2026 |
44000 |
60 |
$18,281,129 |
|
$18,281,129 |
2027 |
42000 |
60 |
$16,228,636 |
|
$16,228,636 |
Total |
5.86E06 |
|
$368,103,576 |
$168,431,335 |
$199,762,244 |
PV per share |
|
|
|
|
$0.20 |
PV per share (tax paid) |
|
|
|
|
$0.14 |
Notes:
1/ All dollar calculated amounts in the table are $NZ. USD oil prices are converted to NZD using $NZ1 = $US0.65.
2/ 'Discounted earnings flow factor' for subsequent years: (1-0.07)= 0.93
3/ No. of shares on issue for Genesis Energy: 1,000,000,000.
Time for the first 'base case' variation. The above table assumes all oil is sold at USD60 per barrel. But 56% of Genesis's sales for 2015 are hedged at USD99.60. Assuming everything else is sold at USD60, this gives an average sale price of:
0.56*USD99.60+0.44*USD60 = USD82.18
Year |
No. of Oil & LPG |
Oil Barrel |
Kupe Condensate |
Resource Depreciation |
Net |
|
Equiv barrels |
Price USD |
Revenue |
and Amortization |
Proceeds |
2015 |
60000 |
82.18 |
$75,854,769 |
$33,381,206 |
$41,473,563 |
2016 |
44000 |
60 |
$37,772,308 |
$31,044,522 |
$6,727,786 |
2017 |
44000 |
60 |
$35,128,246 |
$28,871,405 |
$6,256,841 |
2018 |
44000 |
60 |
$32,669,269 |
$26,850,407 |
$5,818,862 |
2019 |
42000 |
60 |
$29,001,401 |
$24,970,878 |
$4,030,523 |
2020 |
46000 |
60 |
$29,539,998 |
$23,222,917 |
$6,317,082 |
2021 |
44000 |
60 |
$26,277,755 |
|
$26,277,755 |
2022 |
44000 |
60 |
$24,438,312 |
|
$24,438,312 |
2023 |
42000 |
60 |
$21,694,556 |
|
$21,694,556 |
2024 |
44000 |
60 |
$21,136,696 |
|
$21,136,696 |
2025 |
46000 |
60 |
$20,550,633 |
|
$20,550,633 |
2026 |
44000 |
60 |
$18,281,129 |
|
$18,281,129 |
2027 |
42000 |
60 |
$16,228,636 |
|
$16,228,636 |
Total |
5.86E06 |
|
$388,573,730 |
$168,431,335 |
$220,232,395 |
PV per share |
|
|
|
|
$0.22 |
PV per share (tax paid) |
|
|
|
|
$0.16 |
So Genesis's hedging for FY2015 has produced an after tax increase in earnings equivalent to 2c per share. Because this increase is all in the current year, the earnings from from the oil field in total over the field life is also 2cps.
SNOOPY
Last edited by Snoopy; 21-07-2015 at 07:25 PM.
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
21-07-2015, 04:36 PM
#1665
Snoopy mate, sorry for being lazy but to save my brain getting microwaved trying to double check all that how do you see the hedging gains unwinding in FY16 and FY17.
2 cents extra EPS FY15 but what about the remaining hedges for FY16 and there's none in FY17 is that correct ? I see plenty of room for EPS decreases in FY16 and 17 due to previous favourable hedging running out, is that how you see it ? Assume oil is $55 barrel and currency is 65 cents U.S.
Last edited by Beagle; 21-07-2015 at 04:38 PM.
-
21-07-2015, 06:57 PM
#1666
Originally Posted by Roger
Snoopy mate, sorry for being lazy but to save my brain getting microwaved trying to double check all that how do you see the hedging gains unwinding in FY16 and FY17.
2 cents extra EPS FY15 but what about the remaining hedges for FY16 and there's none in FY17 is that correct ? I see plenty of room for EPS decreases in FY16 and 17 due to previous favourable hedging running out, is that how you see it ? Assume oil is $55 barrel and currency is 65 cents U.S.
Roger, p64 in AR2014 conytains the following information on Genesis's oil hedging policy:
----
Light crude oil sales
The Group manages price risk in respect of oil sales by entering into oil options which provide a minimum price for future oil sales or oil price swap contracts which provide a fixed price for future oil sales. The Group’s Treasury policy sets minimum and maximum control limits ranging from between 50 per cent and 75 per cent for the first 12 months to between 25 per cent and 50 per cent for months 13 to 24.
-----
The actual hedging for FY2014 was 68%. Move forward one year and the actual hedging for FY2015 is 56%. Both of these figures are in line with the hedging policy with a one year time horizon. If Genesis are true to their policy, then there will also be hedging in place for FY2016, of between 25 per cent and 50 percent of projected sales. However, I have not seen this figure published anywhere, nor the future price at which this hedging has been set. Have you? Has anyone? If so I am happy to put those figures into my model. At the moment I am being 'conservative' by leaving any FY2016 hedging adjustment out.
Iran coming into the market may see a permanent fall in what the oil producers get. So yes, I am happy to rerun my model with the USD oil price at $US55 if you like.
SNOOPY
Last edited by Snoopy; 21-07-2015 at 06:59 PM.
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
21-07-2015, 07:05 PM
#1667
Originally Posted by Snoopy
Time for the first 'base case' variation. The above table assumes all oil is sold at USD60 per barrel. But 56% of Genesis's sales for 2015 are hedged at USD99.60. Assuming everything else is sold at USD60, this gives an average sale price of:
0.56*USD99.60+0.44*USD60 = USD82.18
Year |
No. of Oil & LPG |
Oil Barrel |
Kupe Condensate |
Resource Depreciation |
Net |
|
Equiv barrels |
Price USD |
Revenue |
and Amortization |
Proceeds |
2015 |
60000 |
82.18 |
$75,854,769 |
$33,381,206 |
$41,473,563 |
2016 |
44000 |
60 |
$37,772,308 |
$31,044,522 |
$6,727,786 |
2017 |
44000 |
60 |
$35,128,246 |
$28,871,405 |
$6,256,841 |
2018 |
44000 |
60 |
$32,669,269 |
$26,850,407 |
$5,818,862 |
2019 |
42000 |
60 |
$29,001,401 |
$24,970,878 |
$4,030,523 |
2020 |
46000 |
60 |
$29,539,998 |
$23,222,917 |
$6,317,082 |
2021 |
44000 |
60 |
$26,277,755 |
|
$26,277,755 |
2022 |
44000 |
60 |
$24,438,312 |
|
$24,438,312 |
2023 |
42000 |
60 |
$21,694,556 |
|
$21,694,556 |
2024 |
44000 |
60 |
$21,136,696 |
|
$21,136,696 |
2025 |
46000 |
60 |
$20,550,633 |
|
$20,550,633 |
2026 |
44000 |
60 |
$18,281,129 |
|
$18,281,129 |
2027 |
42000 |
60 |
$16,228,636 |
|
$16,228,636 |
Total |
5.86E06 |
|
$388,573,730 |
$168,431,335 |
$220,232,395 |
PV per share |
|
|
|
|
$0.22 |
PV per share (tax paid) |
|
|
|
|
$0.16 |
So Genesis's hedging for FY2015 has produced an after tax increase in earnings equivalent to 2c per share. Because this increase is all in the current year, the earnings from from the oil field in total over the field life is also 2cps.
I now want to wind back to prospectus time. We are only talking about early to mid 2014. But back then the outlook for oil was quite different. p70 in the prospectus contains the projected oil prices from that time. So I propose to rerun my oil earnings model using the data from that date.
Year |
No. of Oil & LPG |
Oil Barrel |
Kupe Condensate |
Resource Depreciation |
Net |
|
Equiv barrels |
Price USD |
Revenue |
and Amortization |
Proceeds |
2015 |
60000 |
100.88 |
$80,704,000 |
$33,381,206 |
$47,322,794 |
2016 |
44000 |
95.05 |
$51,859,200 |
$31,044,522 |
$20,814,758 |
2017 |
44000 |
94.28 |
$47,838,426 |
$28,871,405 |
$18,967,021 |
2018 |
44000 |
95.42 |
$45,027,690 |
$26,850,407 |
$18,177,284 |
2019 |
42000 |
97.37 |
$40,789,182 |
$24,970,878 |
$15,818,303 |
2020 |
46000 |
99.31 |
$42,378,738 |
$23,222,917 |
$19,155,821 |
2021 |
44000 |
101.3 |
$38,450,195 |
|
$38,450,195 |
2022 |
44000 |
103.3 |
$36,475,267 |
|
$36,475,267 |
2023 |
42000 |
105.4 |
$33,028,757 |
|
$33,028,257 |
2024 |
44000 |
107.5 |
$32,820,592 |
|
$32,820,592 |
2025 |
46000 |
109.65 |
$32,548,778 |
|
$32,548,778 |
2026 |
44000 |
111.85 |
$29,535,195 |
|
$29,535,195 |
2027 |
42000 |
114.08 |
$26,741,941 |
|
$26,741,941 |
Total |
5.86E06 |
|
$538,198,041 |
$168,431,335 |
$369,856,706 |
PV per share |
|
|
|
|
$0.37 |
PV per share (tax paid) |
|
|
|
|
$0.27 |
My conclusion from comparing 'prospectus figures' and 'my forecast figures' one year later is that the 'intrinsic value' of Genesis shares have declined by around 9c since the company was floated, solely due to the changed outlook for oil.
SNOOPY
Last edited by Snoopy; 22-07-2015 at 11:15 AM.
Reason: add 'missing' total
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
21-07-2015, 07:30 PM
#1668
Originally Posted by Snoopy
I now want to wind back to prospectus time. We are only talking about early to mid 2014. But back then the outlook for oil was quite different. p70 in the prospectus contains the projected oil prices from that time. So I propose to rerun my oil earnings model using the data from that date.
Year |
No. of Oil & LPG |
Oil Barrel |
Kupe Condensate |
Resource Depreciation |
Net |
|
Equiv barrels |
Price USD |
Revenue |
and Amortization |
Proceeds |
2015 |
60000 |
100.88 |
$80,704,000 |
$33,381,206 |
$47,322,794 |
2016 |
44000 |
95.05 |
$51,859,200 |
$31,044,522 |
$20,814,758 |
2017 |
44000 |
94.28 |
$47,838,426 |
$28,871,405 |
$18,967,021 |
2018 |
44000 |
95.42 |
$45,027,690 |
$26,850,407 |
$18,177,284 |
2019 |
42000 |
97.37 |
$40,789,182 |
$24,970,878 |
$15,818,303 |
2020 |
46000 |
99.31 |
$42,378,738 |
$23,222,917 |
$19,155,821 |
2021 |
44000 |
101.3 |
$38,450,195 |
|
$38,450,195 |
2022 |
44000 |
103.3 |
$36,475,267 |
|
$36,475,267 |
2023 |
42000 |
105.4 |
$33,028,757 |
|
$33,028,257 |
2024 |
44000 |
107.5 |
$32,820,592 |
|
$32,820,592 |
2025 |
46000 |
109.65 |
$32,548,778 |
|
$32,548,778 |
2026 |
44000 |
111.85 |
$29,535,195 |
|
$29,535,195 |
2027 |
42000 |
114.08 |
$26,741,941 |
|
$26,741,941 |
Total |
5.86E06 |
|
missing |
$168,431,335 |
$369,856,706 |
PV per share |
|
|
|
|
$0.37 |
PV per share (tax paid) |
|
|
|
|
$0.27 |
My conclusion from comparing 'prospectus figures' and 'my forecast figures' one year later is that the 'intrinsic value' of Genesis shares have declined by around 9c since the company was floated, solely due to the changed outlook for oil.
SNOOPY
You are having fun today!
-
21-07-2015, 07:36 PM
#1669
Originally Posted by Crackity
You are having fun today!
My painfully slow steam powered calculator is at last gathering some head. Shovelling some of that Huntly Coal into the boiler has done the trick!
All part of the longer game of valuing Genesis Energy.
My tactic is to
1/ pull the PV value of Kupe out of Genesis, then
2/ See how what is left relates to the value of the underlying energy and gas distribution business.
SNOOPY
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
21-07-2015, 07:41 PM
#1670
Originally Posted by Snoopy
My painfully slow steam powered calculator is at last gathering some head. Shovelling some of that Huntly Coal into the boiler has done the trick!
All part of the longer game of valuing Genesis Energy.
My tactic is to
1/ pull the PV value of Kupe out of Genesis, then
2/ See how what is left relates to the value of the underlying energy and gas distribution business.
SNOOPY
sounds like a plan - I look forward to the future posts!
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks