sharetrader
Page 179 of 288 FirstFirst ... 79129169175176177178179180181182183189229279 ... LastLast
Results 1,781 to 1,790 of 2876
  1. #1781
    learning to see in the dark
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    240

    Default

    And so begins the climb again. Snakes and ladders is just a training tool for children's' future share investing, the same way musical chairs trains them for finding a carpark.

    Happy to hold.

  2. #1782
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    224

    Default

    My read of the NBR article is positive. They didn't want to sell down in smaller chunks because of the overhang perception it would create. Getting institutional funds on board is the best thing they can have done - they will be strong holders and it will initiate coverage by brokers (like GS already) which will lead to further buying. and then as there is more liquid float, there will be more passive fund buying required at quarter-end.

    Over the last few months, I felt there were too many sellers lined up above $4.30, but I sold out my stake too early, as a result. I bought back in yesterday and topped up what I didn't get allocated. I agree the share price has been flat since Dec, but I think it will soon be off on another run, now this deal is done. I don't think we will see sub-$4.00 again.

    (I heard similar concerns about the ERD placement at $3 (i think?) and look where that is now...)

  3. #1783
    On my rounds and just a little behind..
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gbogo View Post
    My read of the NBR article is positive. They didn't want to sell down in smaller chunks because of the overhang perception it would create. Getting institutional funds on board is the best thing they can have done - they will be strong holders and it will initiate coverage by brokers (like GS already) which will lead to further buying. and then as there is more liquid float, there will be more passive fund buying required at quarter-end.

    Over the last few months, I felt there were too many sellers lined up above $4.30, but I sold out my stake too early, as a result. I bought back in yesterday and topped up what I didn't get allocated. I agree the share price has been flat since Dec, but I think it will soon be off on another run, now this deal is done. I don't think we will see sub-$4.00 again.

    (I heard similar concerns about the ERD placement at $3 (i think?) and look where that is now...)
    Pretty much agree with this. As to why this event at all - well its been alluded to here and that's sad really (if the reason is true).

    Goldman-Sachs are a lot of things, but stupid isn't one of them.

  4. #1784
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ogg View Post
    What criminals.
    Its called serious but legal market manipulation Lol.

  5. #1785
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    224

    Default

    $14.6m gone through on NZX so far today. I think that's a very good sign. And the books in both NZ and on the ASX are full of good-sized bids and offers. As I recall, it was a lot thinner before this sell-down; so people will be happier to take positions and bigger ones, because they know they will be able to get out without killing the market. And there are now many more buyers than sellers lined up, again both on the NZX and ASX. I'm putting my tiny hand up for a few more as well.

  6. #1786
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,427

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gbogo View Post
    My read of the NBR article is positive. They didn't want to sell down in smaller chunks because of the overhang perception it would create. Getting institutional funds on board is the best thing they can have done - they will be strong holders and it will initiate coverage by brokers (like GS already) which will lead to further buying. and then as there is more liquid float, there will be more passive fund buying required at quarter-end.

    Over the last few months, I felt there were too many sellers lined up above $4.30, but I sold out my stake too early, as a result. I bought back in yesterday and topped up what I didn't get allocated. I agree the share price has been flat since Dec, but I think it will soon be off on another run, now this deal is done. I don't think we will see sub-$4.00 again.

    (I heard similar concerns about the ERD placement at $3 (i think?) and look where that is now...)
    I agree with this. The NBR article was a good explanation of what they´ve done and the reasoning for it. Well managed process in my view. Great to have the new institutional investors onboard and all the best for the founder exiting to deal with difficult personal circumstances to deal with.
    I reiterate that I am pleased they´ve stopped thinking about NASDAQ listing as I think it was a very far fetched idea for PPH currently. Prefer they stay focused for now on growing the business and making it cashflow positive. this year
    Last edited by iceman; 20-06-2018 at 08:04 PM.

  7. #1787
    On my rounds and just a little behind..
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    272

    Default

    GSquidward might have PPH at 5.80 but couple of others reckon higher at 6.57!!!!
    http://www.4-traders.com/PUSHPAY-HOLDINGS-LTD-32613790/

    We live in interesting times.

  8. #1788
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,839

    Default

    What you guys think of my revenue projections for the next 9 years. Inputs into my DCF model

    Pretty good eh ....the top line gives an DCF valuation of $5.40


    But Chris says their target is a billion in 10 years when they get that share of giving uo .... might have to do another chart ha ha
    Attached Images Attached Images
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  9. #1789
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    128

    Default

    Liking that 19 parties stumped up an average of $5m + to buy in/more so quickly and at a not-too-discounted price.
    Liking that the SP is recovering quickly too

  10. #1790
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nigelk View Post
    Liking that 19 parties stumped up an average of $5m + to buy in/more so quickly and at a not-too-discounted price.
    Liking that the SP is recovering quickly too
    Very nice, 208,000 swapped at $4.26. Those Buying at $4.04 will be well pleased and those on $4.36 the other day only a little behind.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •