-
26-11-2018, 03:29 PM
#1731
Member
Originally Posted by RupertBear
After unsuccesfully trying to push the sell button on my holdings 3 times (I was interupted twice and I chickened out the third time) I decided it wasnt meant to be so I bought a few more at $0.38 instead ...time will tell if averaging down was was a big mistake...
whats your avge now just out of curiosity?
-
26-11-2018, 03:36 PM
#1732
Originally Posted by James108
The full eps needs to be applied to debt reduction though. In that context any valuation multiple needs to take into account the debt. EBIT to enterprise value of 165/28 = 6 may be an appropriate measure. That ratio seems very appealing if there wasn't a new entrant about to stake a claim to half of metros market share.
James I think the new entrance might take a claim to up to 50% of the NZ residential glass not 50% of MPG total revenue of $268m.
Total NZ residential glass $100m, MPG potential loss $50m.
Remember there are more revenue stream, commercial glass, special glass and Australia.
2018 total $268m revenue, a loss of $50m a material amount but less than 20% of total revenue.
-
26-11-2018, 03:46 PM
#1733
I think you are quite right.
I can't recall seeing any figures on this but unfortunately I think residential is the most profitable part of their business (except retrofit?). Certainly Australia isn't and I recall they had trouble with their commercial contracts recently.
-
26-11-2018, 03:47 PM
#1734
Originally Posted by forest
James I think the new entrance might take a claim to up to 50% of the NZ residential glass not 50% of MPG total revenue of $268m.
Total NZ residential glass $100m, MPG potential loss $50m.
Remember there are more revenue stream, commercial glass, special glass and Australia.
2018 total $268m revenue, a loss of $50m a material amount but less than 20% of total revenue.
Its important for the young ones to understand that if your assumption is correct this implies more than a 20% reduction in profitability as economies of scale in the manufacturing process and overhead structure are lost.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
26-11-2018, 03:58 PM
#1735
Originally Posted by forest
James I think the new entrance might take a claim to up to 50% of the NZ residential glass not 50% of MPG total revenue of $268m.
Total NZ residential glass $100m, MPG potential loss $50m.
Remember there are more revenue stream, commercial glass, special glass and Australia.
2018 total $268m revenue, a loss of $50m a material amount but less than 20% of total revenue.
NZ residential is c. $145m and APL are c. $50m of that revenue I think. The thing is APL supply the aluminium to owner operators with around 70% of the glass going in being Metro supplied.
That will clearly drop quite a bit but given logistics of all these fragmented owner-operators and that they make their own decisions its not clear how much. My gut feeling only is that Metro might lose $25-30m of revenue but the bigger issue will be pricing pressures and who responds best to the changed environment. Don't forget Metro have 55-60% NZ market share so if anyone can cope it "should" be them.
Be interesting to see the valuation multiples implied by the impending sale of Viridian which I believe performs much worse than Metro.
-
26-11-2018, 04:03 PM
#1736
Originally Posted by Filthy
whats your avge now just out of curiosity?
$0.70 .... gonna be a long slow haul to get back up to that, if indeed it ever does...
Last edited by RupertBear; 26-11-2018 at 04:09 PM.
-
26-11-2018, 04:05 PM
#1737
Originally Posted by Arbroath
NZ residential is c. $145m and APL are c. $50m of that revenue I think. The thing is APL supply the aluminium to owner operators with around 70% of the glass going in being Metro supplied.
That will clearly drop quite a bit but given logistics of all these fragmented owner-operators and that they make their own decisions its not clear how much. My gut feeling only is that Metro might lose $25-30m of revenue but the bigger issue will be pricing pressures and who responds best to the changed environment. Don't forget Metro have 55-60% NZ market share so if anyone can cope it "should" be them.
Be interesting to see the valuation multiples implied by the impending sale of Viridian which I believe performs much worse than Metro.
Viridian pretty useless on most counts. Year to March 17 made $0.8m on $96m revenues
Not very good eh ..that’s why CSR trying to hock them off....just can’t compete with market leader.
Last edited by winner69; 26-11-2018 at 04:07 PM.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
26-11-2018, 04:13 PM
#1738
Originally Posted by Beagle
Its important for the young ones to understand that if your assumption is correct this implies more than a 20% reduction in profitability as economies of scale in the manufacturing process and overhead structure are lost.
Probably more than 20% reduction in profitability
Lose $50m sales in NZ means Gross Margin down $25m ....other variable expenses say $5m and unless cuts are made elsewhere that means $20m less profit. Ouch ....that’s all their current profit gone.
On $25m lost sales maybe $10m less profit. Ouch ...that most of current profit gone.
But Metro a pretty resilient and there’s no quarantee that ATL will be successful ....and then Viridian might just disappear or downsize giving heaps of work to Metro (the opportunity they mentioned)
Last edited by winner69; 26-11-2018 at 04:17 PM.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
26-11-2018, 04:13 PM
#1739
Originally Posted by winner69
Viridian pretty useless on most counts. Year to March 17 made $0.8m on $96m revenues
Not very good eh ..that’s why CSR trying to hock them off....just can’t compete with market leader.
If MPG directors hadn't gone on a reckless debt fueled goose chase across the tasman they'd be well positioned to buy this company on the cheap.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
26-11-2018, 04:20 PM
#1740
Originally Posted by winner69
Probably more than 20% reduction in profitability
Lose $50m sales in NZ means Gross Margin down $25m ....other variable expenses say $5m and unless cuts are made elsewhere that means $20m less profit. Ouch ....that’s all their current profit gone.
On $25m lost sales maybe $10m less profit. Ouch ...that most of current profit gone.
But Metro a pretty resilient and there’s no quarantee that ATL will be successful ....and then Viridian might just disappear or downsize giving heaps of work to Metro (the opportunity they mentioned)
That's why I think this is a SELL ! I simply don't believe the new CEO or the board know how to cut their cloth to suit the changing competitive environment. Why ? Simply because of all the lies, half truth's and creative corporate B.S. they have told shareholders since this listed. Does a tiger change its stripes or a leopard change its spots ?...oh hang on a minute...sometimes they do lol
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks