Seems to me that some posters accept the published NTAs of the retirement village as gospel truth.
What we know however that is the institutional market (especially overseas instos) prices in premiums or discounts to the NTAs, depending on their collective view of the property market and values are going.
Hence, the huge premiums to published NTAs during the boom years.
Now that the boom has turned to bust, hardly surprising that there are huge discounts to NTAs.
Why?
As one fundie put it to me a few months ago, they decided to get out of the sector as it was clear that the tide has gone out of the sector and the leverage from 'free equity' & debt that RVs enjoy to rising property values is now going into reverse.
Take OCA as a case in point - 30 Sept 2022:
Total land & buildings - $2.285b
Equity - $964m
'Free equity' - $889m (ror)
Debt - $493m
As can be seen, a 10% drop in property values will wipe 23.6% off NTA ($228m/$964m).
How about a 20% drop? 45.2% off NTA to 73.5c.
So market is pricing in an 18% drop in property values on OCA's sp of 79c vs NTA of $1.34 - realistic?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/h...124-nationally
Median house price to Nov 2022 - nationally down 12.4%
Auckland down 18.4% (some suburbs down 24.8%)
Wellington down 17.4% (some suburbs down 26.6%).
Leverage is a wonderful thing on the way up - it is nasty and un-nerving on the way down. Make sure you have the stomach for it if you ever use leverage or play leverage!
Bookmarks