sharetrader
  1. #17141
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    899

    Default

    Good work BP. But it would be a foolish CEO and Chair who did not proactively monitor this thread from time to time, so I believe they are aware. Looking forward to a repost in due course of the response you receive.

  2. #17142
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    BP …if she is still there ask Anna anna.thorburn@oceaniahealthcare.co.nz

    You will get ‘thanks for your enquiry Peter but unfortunately but we cannot share this information with you at this time’
    Quote Originally Posted by Baa_Baa View Post
    If you're a shareholder and want to contact them, this is a better email than the general 'enquires' ... investor@oceaniahealthcare.co.nz "you can contact Computershare with any shareholder queries."
    cheers, I guess I will see whether I get anything on my original request back, but will use these to slowly escalate ;
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  3. #17143
    Advanced Member Entrep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,882

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ronaldson View Post
    But it would be a foolish CEO and Chair who did not proactively monitor this thread from time to time
    how so?

    10 characters
    BTC went to $69K and now $16K. Good thing I’ve been warning you since it was $3K! I was right!

  4. #17144
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,137

    Default

    might hit the 60s soon
    one step ahead of the herd

  5. #17145
    Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    3,379

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    might hit the 60s soon
    Let's hope.

  6. #17146
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,082

    Default

    If bond yields are anything to go by Synlait, Oceania and Fletchers are the ‘riskiest’ companies on the NZDX

    Oceania in good company
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  7. #17147
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    705

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    If bond yields are anything to go by Synlait, Oceania and Fletchers are the ‘riskiest’ companies on the NZDX

    Oceania in good company
    How do you get this? Those two have actual issues on the table while oca is subject to some speculation its just following a trend. Plus it has tangible assets. We don't need another Met life scenario.

  8. #17148
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,082

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mike2020 View Post
    How do you get this? Those two have actual issues on the table while oca is subject to some speculation its just following a trend. Plus it has tangible assets. We don't need another Met life scenario.
    Just that they are highest yielding bonds on nzdx ….some see this as a measure of “risk”

    As a matter of interest MET bonds are yielding less.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  9. #17149
    Membaa
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,412

    Default

    You stirring again, OCA (has more than one bond) is half SML bonds and within cooee of all the RVs, REIT’s and other big names like IFT etc. What exactly did you want to say by making that post? Disingenuous it seems.

  10. #17150
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,082

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baa_Baa View Post
    You stirring again, OCA (has more than one bond) is half SML bonds and within cooee of all the RVs, REIT’s and other big names like IFT etc. What exactly did you want to say by making that post? Disingenuous it seems.
    Looking at the order/ranking of bond yields and the differences between each of the RV companies I think the market is trying to tell us something about they think of the relative merits of these four companies…..and how ‘risky’ they are as an investment

    From NZDX -

    OCA 8.2%/8.33%
    ARV 8.05%
    MET.7.82%
    RYM 7.43%
    SUM 6.99%/7.00%/7.29%

    The 5 year Govt rate is 5.4% …..so spread/premium SUM has is 1.4% points v OCA of 2.8% points …….that’s quite significant and not within cooee of each other as you say
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •