-
11-12-2023, 09:11 AM
#17701
Let's not forget that in 2021 underlying earnings understated NPAT by 50% or more.
So they are not always making the official numbers look better.
-
11-12-2023, 09:46 AM
#17702
Originally Posted by Baa_Baa
I also agree, 'underlying EPS' is a bogus measure, it depends on what metrics they use for 'underlying'. Just get rid of it, EPS is EPS, these CFO's need to stop stop farking around with the numbers! Especially to make the numbers look better than they are!. EDITDA is EDITDA, NPAT is NPAT, EPS is EPS, etc, underlying 'U' has no place in financial reporting, it is bogus and misleading. The FMA should be looking into this distorted and misleading financial reporting.
I am not sure if the text above was a typo or an exceptionally clever but subtle dig at accounting reporting standards which I was a bit slow to recognise. It is very funny though.
'EBITDA' means 'Earnings Before Interest Tax Depreciation and Amortisation'
'EDITDA' means take away the annual depreciation and amortisation adjustments from earnings and 'Edit' your remaining net earnings in whatever way you like.
It looks like there has been quite a bit of 'EDITDA' reporting in the retirement sector over the last few years. LOL!
SNOOPY
Last edited by Snoopy; 11-12-2023 at 09:47 AM.
Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7
-
11-12-2023, 09:57 AM
#17703
Its clearly stated in OCA account's directors will make up there own assumptions of underlying profit and report this as there results.
one step ahead of the herd
-
11-12-2023, 09:58 AM
#17704
Originally Posted by bull....
Its clearly stated in OCA account's directors will make up there own assumptions of underlying profit and report this as there results.
Accounts...
-
11-12-2023, 10:41 AM
#17705
Originally Posted by SailorRob
Accounts...
Jeez bull, if you cant get the apostrophe in the right place how can I trust what you print is correct....I'm afraid I will never read your posts ever ever ever again so it's only sailor,s posts from now on
-
11-12-2023, 10:42 AM
#17706
Member
To some it's more important to be technically correct than fun at parties.
-
11-12-2023, 10:51 AM
#17707
Originally Posted by bull....
Its clearly stated in OCA account's directors will make up there own assumptions of underlying profit and report this as there results.
And while I,very got you there I,m sure the there that you put there is not the their that you meant to put there so there
-
11-12-2023, 11:00 AM
#17708
Originally Posted by ziggy415
And while I,very got you there I,m sure the there that you put there is not the their that you meant to put there so there
their there be nice
one step ahead of the herd
-
11-12-2023, 11:22 AM
#17709
Member
Bull isn’t focused on grammar. Cross referencing hog futures against dry bulk ratios across 6 screens, juxtaposing the 2 month lag in Jackson hole references to “transitory” to Nz retiree count in Nelson district takes concentration people.
-
11-12-2023, 11:29 AM
#17710
Originally Posted by Leemsip
Bull isn’t focused on grammar. Cross referencing hog futures against dry bulk ratios across 6 screens, juxtaposing the 2 month lag in Jackson hole references to “transitory” to Nz retiree count in Nelson district takes concentration people.
correct.
grammer does not make someone a good investor. analytical skills, market knowledge and ability to make sound decisions based on info are more important
one step ahead of the herd
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks