sharetrader
Page 19 of 1979 FirstFirst ... 915161718192021222329691195191019 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 19788
  1. #181
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    2,041

    Default

    At the end of the day management is not stupid. Increase in wages will only incur extra costs onto the elderly. No business will just suck up the cost of increased wages. They will pass it on and it will be business as usual.

  2. #182
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ggcc View Post
    At the end of the day management is not stupid. Increase in wages will only incur extra costs onto the elderly. No business will just suck up the cost of increased wages. They will pass it on and it will be business as usual.
    You can only pass it onto private paying residents not those receiving the residential care subsidy.

  3. #183
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    2,041

    Default

    someone will have to foot the bill and it would be ridiculous to think the shareholders should pay for it. I am all for everyone's wages increasing,but it always comes at a cost to either the customer or the government (The government is us as a nation). You would know where they would get the money from more than I would couta. I appreciate your input on this 😊

  4. #184
    Legend peat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Whanganui, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    You can only pass it onto private paying residents not those receiving the residential care subsidy.
    Further to the previous quote from the prospectus .....

    Oceania’s current intention is to seek to recover the cost of any potential wage increases for staffthat may not be covered by DHB funding by applying for a variation to its funding contracts withthe DHBs
    For clarity, nothing I say is advice....

  5. #185
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peat View Post
    Further to the previous quote from the prospectus .....

    Oceania’s current intention is to seek to recover the cost of any potential wage increases for staffthat may not be covered by DHB funding by applying for a variation to its funding contracts withthe DHBs
    Good luck trying to get any extra funding out of cash strapped DHB's. Aged care is low on their priority list, they don't want to pass on an extra cent above the Govt allocation. Remember this industry is still grossly underfunded by the Govt.

  6. #186
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ggcc View Post
    someone will have to foot the bill and it would be ridiculous to think the shareholders should pay for it. I am all for everyone's wages increasing,but it always comes at a cost to either the customer or the government (The government is us as a nation). You would know where they would get the money from more than I would couta. I appreciate your input on this 
    Until you get your property portfolio steaming along, extra money required can only be obtained by passing on some cost to private paying residents and charging extra for premium rooms, but the main factor is keeping the wages to revenue percentage down and focussing on consumable wastage.
    Last edited by couta1; 05-05-2017 at 02:51 PM.

  7. #187
    Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    4,778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    Until you get your property portfolio steaming along, extra money required can only be obtained by passing on some cost to private paying residents and charging extra for premium rooms, but the main factor is keeping the wages to revenue percentage down and focussing on consumable wastage.
    I am not certain but isn't there a "maximum contribution" set by Director General of Health for those whose assets/income exceed the thresh-hold allowed for the residential care subsidy. So it would be up to the government to decide to pass on the extra costs to those who are not eligible for a care subsidy?

  8. #188
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,742

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    Growth of 40% for FY2018, yeah right, it ain't going to happen.
    Wages aside


    from the prospectus

    "approximately 30.4% of Oceania’s Pro forma Underlying EBITDA (pre corporate / other costs)is derived from the sale and re-sale of Units in FY2017F, increasing to approximately 43.8% inFY2018F "

  9. #189
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,742

    Default

    ".....the DHBs, as well as by achieving higher productivity levels and lower temporary staf fing costs inits aged care business. "
    Pretty sure this happens where my mother is but def haven't confirmed it, like moving nurses backwards and forwards between the various "homes' in the hospital care section.
    Disappointing debut for OCA but that happened to ARV as well as TJ pointed out and the whole sector has come off the boil atp with most under the M/A's. Still way more sellers than buyers showing so will watch for a while and see if it all flushes out and we have an ARV like rerate hopefully.
    Last edited by Joshuatree; 05-05-2017 at 06:42 PM.

  10. #190
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,742

    Default

    And as just pointed out to me, the Auckland property mkt is going backwards atm so that along with the wage increase as an unfortunate timing for an IPO is an understatement indeed.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •