there is still 12 to 24 months before you need to buy in again? lets face it this thing is not going parabolic any time soon..... i hope not... not in with anything worth keeping yet... i am hoping it will take 2.5 to 3 years before it gets over 175...and it will still be cheap.
The word is out, $68.7m !!!!...who would have thought
There's no leak guys...come on...the huge grin made it obvious I was just having a bit of fun.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
with the recent gold plated impersonations , leaky photo messages of all shorts of portrait art by reputable honorary folk before during or after lock down one cant be sure what to believe anymore ... ...68 million! boy that earl is some sales man and the sandy shore apartments must have done the job after all! .. of course i have no idea but MR B say its a long term story and that surely means 5 - 7 years unless accountants have suddenly change the meaning of Fixed Assets to current assets and brought forward future revaluations into current assets in a new standard we havnt seen in the research archives yet and published as a research discussion paper. Bit like the advanced trusts paper was in 1995? or was it 1997? Look how long that took to come home to roost...
anyone want to go higher than 2 dollars in 2.5 years? surely the man who calls himself MAV who has a model will soon know.
There's no leak guys...come on...the huge grin made it obvious I was just having a bit of fun.
Oh no...... went to bed last night with a huge happy grin on my face dreaming of $68.7 mill........for awhile I thought ShareTrader was taking after our politicians with all their leaks......what could possibly go wrong!!??
with the recent gold plated impersonations , leaky photo messages of all shorts of portrait art by reputable honorary folk before during or after lock down one cant be sure what to believe anymore ... ...68 million! boy that earl is some sales man and the sandy shore apartments must have done the job after all! .. of course i have no idea but MR B say its a long term story and that surely means 5 - 7 years unless accountants have suddenly change the meaning of Fixed Assets to current assets and brought forward future revaluations into current assets in a new standard we havnt seen in the research archives yet and published as a research discussion paper. Bit like the advanced trusts paper was in 1995? or was it 1997? Look how long that took to come home to roost...
anyone want to go higher than 2 dollars in 2.5 years? surely the man who calls himself MAV who has a model will soon know.
Yes, I’m calling >$2 within 2.5 years. My conservative valuation suggested a present value of $1.90; next year’s half and full year results will trigger a re-rating of this stock if not next week.
there we have PARADOX has it over 2 dollars within 24 months! No one went for the email leak, Earl would have kittens and its not even april fools day. Definitely a huge forward weighting machine and with you all looking to invest your MET GAINS paradox might be right and no where to get a TD deposit return any time soon MR B may be right on the money... its show time any hour now..unless you have a huge gains on microsoft and that is fully valued now for sure according to CNBC traders Mr Worth.
why then do we have sellers at 103,04, because these are just a few who bought at 40-50 and taking a small profit? and will we see these numbers going forward in the sales column for the next 12 months? If so there is no hurry to buy.
Originally Posted by Cyclical
Reply With Quote
...68 million! boy that earl is some sales man and the sandy shore apartments must have done the job after all! .. of course i have no idea but MR B say its a long term story and that surely means 5 - 7 years unless accountants have suddenly change the meaning of Fixed Assets to current assets and brought forward future revaluations into current assets in a new standard we havnt seen in the research archives yet and published as a research discussion paper. Bit like the advanced trusts paper was in 1995? or was it 1997? Look how long that took to come home to roost...
Bookmarks