sharetrader
Page 1977 of 1977 FirstFirst ... 977147718771927196719731974197519761977
Results 19,761 to 19,765 of 19765
  1. #19761
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjauck View Post
    I guess OCA could sell a village at above NTA value and then buyback its shares which are trading at below NTA?
    Doesn't that apply to all of the property companies out there at the moment? Most are trading at heavy discounts to NTA. My initial reaction is that the asset valuation is suspect? Or is the market wrong?

  2. #19762
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,889

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daytr View Post
    Or just stick to their knitting.
    The biggest issue they face is they run operationally at a loss.
    This is why I don't buy into the NTA, where do you value a loss making asset?
    Summarising daytr and blackcap post I see the share price as NTA less (degree of suspect valuations) less (present value of operational losses) …and maybe less a value attributed to a company specific negative sentiment.
    Last edited by winner69; Today at 01:05 PM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #19763
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Summarising daytr and blackcap post I see the share price as NTA less (degree of suspect valuations) less (present value of operational losses) …and maybe less a value attributed to a company specific negative sentiment.
    Which is why I pose the question, perhaps you can eat NTA after all?

    If the market is valuing the business at under half NTA and it's possible to sell the assets at book value, maybe it's not so silly to actually start selling bits off.
    Last edited by allfromacell; Today at 01:24 PM.

  4. #19764
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baa_Baa View Post
    What would that achieve for shareholders, selling the sliver (killing the golden goose) and buying back the stock?
    Increasing every financial metric per share.

  5. #19765
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,889

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allfromacell View Post
    Increasing every financial metric per share.
    …in the hope the share price will increase eh (like same PE on higher EPS) …but many studies have shown this hardly ever happens

    Biggest beneficiaries are often management who have bonuses based on EPS or TSR … they think buybacks are cool.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •