-
29-09-2020, 12:12 PM
#6611
Originally Posted by bull....
brought some more today
Good that OCA being dragged up by positiveness in the sector
Rising tide lifts all boats they say ...even the more doggy ones
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
29-09-2020, 12:20 PM
#6612
Bond issue - product disclosure statement http://nzx-prod-s7fsd7f98s.s3-websit...397/331561.pdf
Minimum interest rate is not set until 5 October.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
29-09-2020, 12:23 PM
#6613
Originally Posted by Beagle
thats a important thing in the commentary afterwards what rate they set , the better the rate they get the bigger the demand was and means the more people wanted a slice of the company. good result should mean something to stock price
one step ahead of the herd
-
29-09-2020, 12:28 PM
#6614
Not many pictures ...but that Liz will sell $50m on her own
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
29-09-2020, 12:38 PM
#6615
Originally Posted by bull....
thats a important thing in the commentary afterwards what rate they set , the better the rate they get the bigger the demand was and means the more people wanted a slice of the company. good result should mean something to stock price
It's very good timing for a long 7 year bond issue with interest rates at unprecedented lows.
We can get a heads-up on the likely rate by looking at where similar bonds are trading on the NZDX secondary market.
SUM030 2027 bond last traded 1.95%
MET010 2026 bond bid at 2.05%, no offer.
How good is the timing ? Well it might be useful to compare to SUM's first issue of $100m bonds, SUM010 which were issued with a yield of 4.78% !
If OCA can get the issue away at say 2% that's 2.78% less than SUM's first issue and a quite considerable saving of $2.78 million per annum in interest costs (on a $100m OCA issue) compared to what SUM are paying on their first debt issue. Pretty handy annual saving compared to what SUM is paying !
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
29-09-2020, 01:05 PM
#6616
Originally Posted by Beagle
It's very good timing for a long 7 year bond issue with interest rates at unprecedented lows.
We can get a heads-up on the likely rate by looking at where similar bonds are trading on the NZDX secondary market.
SUM030 2027 bond last traded 1.95%
MET010 2026 bond bid at 2.05%, no offer.
How good is the timing ? Well it might be useful to compare to SUM's first issue of $100m bonds, SUM010 which were issued with a yield of 4.78% !
If OCA can get the issue away at say 2% that's 2.78% less than SUM's first issue and a quite considerable saving of $2.78 million per annum in interest costs (on a $100m OCA issue) compared to what SUM are paying on their first debt issue. Pretty handy annual saving compared to what SUM is paying !
Bit outrageous comments isn’t it mate ...might be factual but rather irrelevant don’t you agree (comparing the time differences and what’s happened to rates since 2017)
OK - I get it ..Oceania is the greatest thing on earth since slice bread and Summerset is a load of the old proverbial.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
29-09-2020, 03:55 PM
#6617
Originally Posted by winner69
Bit outrageous comments isn’t it mate ...might be factual but rather irrelevant don’t you agree (comparing the time differences and what’s happened to rates since 2017)
Absolutely its factual and relevant. Nearly $3m in annual cost savings compared to where another company issued debt confers a material advantage, especially when the other company has 3 debt issues in the market to fund an unusually large land bank. We all know interest rates have dropped since 2017, however nonetheless the advantage is still relevant. SUM did well at the time to get the 4.78% issue done...there... do we feel better now ?
OK - I get it ..Oceania is the greatest thing on earth since slice bread and Summerset is a load of the old proverbial.
Now you're just being argumentative. You seem super sensitive about comparisons between companies in this sector, especially anything to do with SUM.
People have been comparing companies in this sector for many many years and its not going to stop because you're getting all bitter and twisted.
Last edited by Beagle; 29-09-2020 at 03:57 PM.
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
-
29-09-2020, 04:08 PM
#6618
Originally Posted by winner69
Bit outrageous comments isn’t it mate ...might be factual but rather irrelevant don’t you agree (comparing the time differences and what’s happened to rates since 2017)
OK - I get it ..Oceania is the greatest thing on earth since slice bread and Summerset is a load of the old proverbial.
Out of interest, I looked back on my spreadsheet to the 21st of May and see that on that day I sold all of may SUM @ $6.12 and loaded up with OCA @ .78.
Roll forward 4 and a bit months (where did that time go??) and at time of writing we have:
SUM $8.95 (46% gain)
OCA $1.11 (42% gain)
Not a hell of a lot in it and if we look at today's high for both, it would probably be even Stevens. Pretty handy results for both, no matter which way you look at it.
The moral of the story, don't get too caught up in opinions and stories and stay diversified.
-
29-09-2020, 04:41 PM
#6619
One good thing at getting $125m from the bond issue at say 2.1%/2.2% is that it will in the short term replace debt that's costing them 3%-4%. That'll save a few bob.
They say funds for paying down debt and funding growth in due course.
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
29-09-2020, 04:49 PM
#6620
Most real estate analysts are predicting 5-10% gains in residential real estate over the next 12 months
Is it too simplistic to say that there is a one to one correlation between the value of retirement village property assets and the value of residential property
If the residential market increases by say 10% then do our 1.5bill approx property assets increase by 150m
and other associated liabilities remain constant. Thus assuming 610mill shares do we add 0.25 to our NTA
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks