sharetrader
Page 44 of 169 FirstFirst ... 344041424344454647485494144 ... LastLast
Results 431 to 440 of 1683
  1. #431
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Arrowtown - New Zealand
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Thank you mr Tiger

    Didn’t think of going back to March presentation

    So gone from $1.16 to $1.17 over last 6 months ....doesn’t seem very much

    And from $1.36 to $1.17 over last 10 months ... go figure.

  2. #432
    Senior Member hardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    In a bubble
    Posts
    726

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    I obviously don’t explain things very well

    So is today’s ‘valuation’ (company worth) dependent upon this embedded value?

    Nobody has answered my query as to what this ‘net implied value increased to $1.17 a share’ statement means.
    Another name for NTA

  3. #433
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,857

    Exclamation Wrong

    Quote Originally Posted by hardt View Post
    Another name for NTA
    You did not follow the link I provided did you ?
    om mani peme hum

  4. #434
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,838

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hardt View Post
    Another name for NTA
    Don't think so

    NTA reported as $0.98

    This net implied value of $1.19 as per Paper Tiger
    Last edited by winner69; 24-11-2017 at 09:35 PM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  5. #435
    Senior Member hardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    In a bubble
    Posts
    726

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paper Tiger View Post
    You did not follow the link I provided did you ?
    Did not see your post... would have said anything to stop the persistent questioning.
    Last edited by hardt; 25-11-2017 at 07:02 AM.

  6. #436
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,838

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Deej5 View Post
    And from $1.36 to $1.17 over last 10 months ... go figure.
    All to do with all the new shares they have issued ....130 million extra since Sep16

    They say everything is eps accretive so we must trust them

    Still haven’t sussed why revaluations were so low in H1 - compared to pcp as well as to likes of Ryman and Summerset on a relative basis. They say the H1 $8.9m was mainly from recently acquired villages, does this suggest older villages not getting more valuable
    Last edited by winner69; 25-11-2017 at 09:58 AM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  7. #437
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    All to do with all the new shares they have issued ....130 million extra since Sep16

    They say everything is eps accretive so we must trust them

    Still haven’t sussed why revaluations were so low in H1 - compared to pcp as well as to likes of Ryman and Summerset on a relative basis. They say the H1 $8.9m was mainly from recently acquired villages, does this suggest older villages not getting more valuable
    Possibly does suggest older villages are not getting that much more valuable, but then again they haven't seen noticeable weakness... maybe they are just given the folk in Christchurch a better deal?
    Embedded value still climbing and this 2nd half around 65 villas are to be delivered (the villas have 2x higher embedded value, as I'm sure you know, compared to serviced apartment... must mean something good) and begin sell down of these many villas this 2nd half (a large majority of the huge, by dog standards, 94 total deliveries expected this half)

    Would not surprise me to see a 'jump' in fair value of investment properties in the 2nd half, not only due to more being delivered and sold, but also given in the 2017 financial year, 2nd half revaluations accounted for about 64% of the full year.

    Although ARV is only up 4.6 ish percent this year, ARV's track record of delivering shareholder value, a fair bit via EPS accretive acquisitions, they've pretty good so far especially given they are the 'original dog'
    sum other operators haven't even returned half a peanut, sorry half a percent, the last 52 weeks according to NZX's website
    Last edited by trader_jackson; 25-11-2017 at 04:47 PM.

  8. #438
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Another big off-market trade this morning to open. Looks like someone is accumulating on the sidelines?

  9. #439
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,838

    Default

    ARV don't seem to have given any guidance for F18 except that he 3 new villages will add $9m of underlying profit

    Anybody done any sums or have any idea what their actually underlying profit for F18 could be - a bit more specific than awesomely amazing would be appreciated.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  10. #440
    Guru
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,601

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    ARV don't seem to have given any guidance for F18 except that he 3 new villages will add $9m of underlying profit

    Anybody done any sums or have any idea what their actually underlying profit for F18 could be - a bit more specific than awesomely amazing would be appreciated.
    With ARV delivering 99% of its villas and apartments and stuff this 2nd half, and the usual strong continuing resales of existing stuff (unlike sum operators), I'll let them off so they can focus on getting all the synergies and delivers sorted, before delivering a bumper profit (and outlook for the coming year) come the big day in 2018.
    Management may even be considered generous giving everyone else a chance to get on board while ARV is still the cheapest operator on the NZX (and the recent trades would indicate time is running out)

    Forsyth, reckon $30.7m underlying in 2018 full year (yes, a bigly 2nd half on the way - as I've mentioned already), jumping a massive third to $40.2m in 2019.

    But be careful because Forsyth were pretty conservative... they thought ARV's half year would be just $11.0m underlying (it was actually $12.4m - a whooping 13% higher than Forsyth thought... maybe they are the ones buying even more for their clients or something?)

    Forsyth thought RYM would deliver 85.0, they were nearly bang on as they actually delivered 85.2 underlying so they must be kinda good at estimating this sector, well estimating some, underestimating others anyway.
    Last edited by trader_jackson; 27-11-2017 at 09:13 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •