-
22-01-2014, 12:33 PM
#2151
Originally Posted by J R Ewing
On that basis McDonalds should be listed on every stock exchange in the world! What is the benefit to SNK as a company of being listed in the country where 95% of the sales are made, as opposed to some other exchange?
J R, Do Mc Don have 95% of their business in each country that they trade in , no just where they are listed.
-
22-01-2014, 01:19 PM
#2152
Member
Originally Posted by Balance
Which begs the question - why list in NZ iun the first place then unless ..?
From what I remember it was because the amount of money they needed wasnt that much, and listing on NZX is much easier than ASX. So they took the easier route.
-
22-01-2014, 01:19 PM
#2153
Member
Compliance costs can't be anywhere near what I think they are then, if a $30M capitalization company gets enough PR exposure from listing on two exchanges to make that worthwhile.
-
22-01-2014, 01:58 PM
#2154
Member
Read the interim report again,
Balance Sheet
NK keeps cash and equivalents as much as $6,923,709. Receivables $2,088,505. It has as little as $15,720 in fixed assets. Why it raised loan from bank, increasing by 138.5% to $2,260,343. Does anybody know why it borrows money and use the money for what purpose? Parentally, it does not purchase fixed assets or huge research on software or technology.
Who can explain the accumulated loss in Equity, $4,115,756 in 2013?
-
22-01-2014, 02:26 PM
#2155
Twitter is at 70 times sales and losses heaps
As some say grossly undervalued at 70 times sales
-
22-01-2014, 02:35 PM
#2156
Member
Originally Posted by winner69
Twitter is at 70 times sales and losses heaps
As some say grossly undervalued at 70 times sales
And MAYBE Twitter will figure out how to make heaps in the future and justify that valuation. But if it continues losing heaps in the long term, eventually the bubble will burst and it will be worth zilch.
-
22-01-2014, 02:41 PM
#2157
The like of Twitter and Facebook don't care buying out companies for several hundred million dollars if it benefits them. Especially for one that makes them money in the long run. That is my best case scenario for SNK.
-
22-01-2014, 02:44 PM
#2158
Member
http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/...or-49-billion/
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/...finitely-crazy
Ok, if all like this style, I change my tongue for SNK. buy buy buy !!!
We can see smart money flowing into SNK since last Nov, when the right time kicks in, SNK would be another WYN for buying!!!
Last edited by 000831; 22-01-2014 at 02:49 PM.
-
22-01-2014, 02:47 PM
#2159
I don't say buy SNK but have it as a speculative holding in a well diversified portfolio. In my NZX portfolio is represents about 4.5% of my holdings.
-
22-01-2014, 02:52 PM
#2160
Member
Originally Posted by silu
I don't say buy SNK but have it as a speculative holding in a well diversified portfolio. In my NZX portfolio is represents about 4.5% of my holdings.
The stock opened on the New York Stock Exchange in November last year at $US26, peaked at $US74.73 on Boxing Day and closed this morning $US62.32. In the first half, revenue increased 107 per cent to $US253.6 million while the loss increased 41 per cent to $US69.3 million.
If all those US big firms are doing similar thing as SNK, then I have nothing to say, just following the trend. Going to buy now. at least it below the initial price still have chance to triple in price.
Last edited by 000831; 22-01-2014 at 02:55 PM.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks