sharetrader
Results 1 to 10 of 80

Threaded View

  1. #9
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,349

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by STMOD View Post
    This post is from STMOD and does not represent the views of Vince or the Site owners.

    Thank you all for your posts and private messages received so far expressing your views.

    Not all the bans that happen on this site are by STMOD and at there is no intention of discussing individual bans.

    Much as posters have different views of individual companies, forum members have different views of what are acceptable posts and behaviours and this does lead, at times, to moderators being in a no-win situation. Someone is unhappy whatever decision is made.

    Moderators do not read every single post on this forum, though certain threads do at times get some attention, but in the main it is up to forum members to report posts that are considered inappropriate.
    Moderators are also not necessarily in a position to respond quickly to such reports and patient is required before the report is either acted on or not. Also whilst it is considered a courtesy to reply to reports that are not acted on, this is not always practicable.

    However there is obviously a degree of dissatisfaction with recent events and this feedback will be taken into consideration in the future.

    STMOD
    I think you must try harder.
    Banning members without reading the thread is a hopeless situation.
    You do yourself no credit,and let down Sharetrader site.
    In this latest case you banned both Roger and Paper Tiger,while there was no cause to ban Paper Tiger,had you read the thread.
    You did the same to me one time Roger baited me,and I questioned your judgementand.It would appear it has only been "good" members pointing out the errors of your ways, that both Paper Tiger and myself were quickly reinstated.
    Had you read the threads, and followed conversations over the years, you would have realised the best moderator the site has had has been a poster.! That poster has been Paper Tiger, who has questioned a number of posters, when they have had their facts wrong,or have just lost the plot.
    Banning Paper Tiger by mistake, just means your credibility is further lowered.
    I would also point out I have not seen Paper Tiger post since his ban was lifted.
    I would think you owe him an apology.
    Last edited by percy; 07-12-2015 at 08:05 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •