sharetrader
Results 1 to 10 of 1478

Threaded View

  1. #6
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,363

    Default BT2/ Increasing eps trend (one setback allowed): FY2020 perspective

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post

    Financial Year EBITDAF less Adjustment less DA less I times 0.72= Normalised NPAT eps
    2013 $391m -($16.4m + $4.2m) $150m $57m $147.1m 10.5cps
    2014 $504m $161m $84m $186.5m 13.3cps
    2015 $482m $17m/0.72 $170m $99m $136.4m 9.7cps
    2016 $493m $13m/0.72 $182m $97m $141.1m 10.1cps
    2017 $523m $5m $189m $95m $168.5m 12.0cps

    Notes:

    1/ 'eps' figures based on 1,400m share being on issue
    2/ FY2013 earnings modified by adding back IPO costs and loss on sale of German Geothermal Asset.
    3/ FY2015 and FY2016 earnings reduced by property/land sale profits (adjusted to reflect that non-core property land sales are not generally taxable.)
    4/ FY2017 result adjusted to remove profit on carbon credit sales.

    Conclusion: Pass Test

    Further Note: I have put up these results in tabular form so that you can see the working, and an interesting point that is evident from it. If you take the best year (FY2014) and the last reported year (FY2017), then the $18m fall in profit should be read in context with the $28m increase in depreciation charge over the two years. IOW leave out the depreciation (which is dubious in these power generating assets anyway) and the FY2017 result was actually the best of the lot ( I guess this is why management like to use EBITDAF when reporting their results?). Quite impressive nevertheless.

    SNOOPY

    PS Eagle eyed readers will notice that some earnings figures have changed from when I did them two years ago.

    1/ I previously made a different adjustment in FY2013 to reflect an impairment charge that was never included in EBITDAF to start with. I also did not adjust for the two factors that I did adjust for in this year's analysis. (my mistake)
    2/ In FY2015 I assumed that the profits on the property sale I adjusted for was taxable. I have now changed my mind and decided it was probably not taxable.
    Financial Year EBITDAF less Adjustment less DA less I times 0.72= Normalised NPAT eps
    2016 $493m ($13m/0.72 - $2m) $182m $97m $142.5m 10.2cps
    2017 $523m ($5m-$2m) $189m $95m $169.9m 12.1cps
    2018 $561m $2m $197m $91m $195.1m 13.9cps
    2019 $505m -$1m $204m $75m $163.4m 11.7cps
    2020 $494m -$1m $214m $54m $162.7m 11.6cps

    Notes:

    1/ 'eps' figures based on 1,400m share being on issue
    2/ Underlying FY2016 earnings reduced by property/land sale profits (adjusted to reflect that non-core property land sales are not generally taxable). (AR2016 p10,54) and increased by Property Plant and Equipment sale losses (AR2016 p71).
    3/ Underlying FY2017 result adjusted to remove profit on carbon credit sales (p60 AR2017) and increased by Property Plant and Equipment sale losses (AR2017 p31).
    4/ Underlying FY2018 result reduced by a $2m Property Plant and Equipment sale gain (AR2018 p29).
    5/ Underlying FY2019 result increased by a $1m Property Plant and Equipment sale loss (AR2019 p90).
    6/ Underlying FY2020 result increased by a $1m Property Plant and Equipment sale loss (AR2020 p67).

    CONCLUSION: There is only one underlying profit drop here, from FY2018 to FY2019 (The 2019 to 2020 profit drop is within the error bounds of a rounding error) => Pass Test

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 13-08-2022 at 10:49 AM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •