-
02-06-2023, 07:27 AM
#111
Originally Posted by Panda-NZ-
The wayne brown stadium.. with a statue of wayne in bronze at the entrance.
It would be more attractive to him than being known as the wierd guy who "kept rates low" but still 7%.
From the ignoramus Labour peasant panda-nz who wanted Ryman to borrow more money to do a share buyback when it was close to default on its burdensome debt.
Keep your bankrupt Labour thinking to your ilk.
Contemptuous laugh.
-
02-06-2023, 07:28 AM
#112
Originally Posted by Panda-NZ-
The wayne brown stadium.. with a statue of wayne in bronze at the entrance.
It would be more attractive to him than being known as the wierd guy who "kept rates low" but still 7%.
Wayne Brown is in this terrible position because of the foolish profligacy of the previous two Left wing mayors ‘Pants Down’ Len Brown and Phil Goff. Billions and billions of debt piled up with absolutely nothing to show for it…..which seems to be the Labour way.
-
02-06-2023, 07:52 AM
#113
Originally Posted by Logen Ninefingers
Wayne Brown is in this terrible position because of the foolish profligacy of the previous two Left wing mayors ‘Pants Down’ Len Brown and Phil Goff. Billions and billions of debt piled up with absolutely nothing to show for it…..which seems to be the Labour way.
To be expected from panda-nz, Labour shill, who believes in piling on ever more debts for future generations to pay. As long as the debt breeds more loyal Labour voters - beneficiaries, parasites and losers.
Last edited by Balance; 02-06-2023 at 08:19 AM.
-
02-06-2023, 08:35 AM
#114
Originally Posted by Logen Ninefingers
Wayne Brown is in this terrible position because of the foolish profligacy of the previous two Left wing mayors ‘Pants Down’ Len Brown and Phil Goff. Billions and billions of debt piled up with absolutely nothing to show for it…..which seems to be the Labour way.
I'm not the one who wants to give the current mayor an extra $2b in funding here.
-
02-06-2023, 08:43 AM
#115
Originally Posted by Panda-NZ-
I'm not the one who wants to give the current mayor an extra $2b in funding here.
Ignoramus peasant panda-nz who wanted Ryman to pile up more unsustainable debt to do a share buyback when the company was close to default on its debts!
That's the pathetic level of intelligence & Bankrupt mentality exhibited by him and the leftist Auckland mayors Phil Goff and Len 'drop pants' Brown.
Last edited by Balance; 02-06-2023 at 08:47 AM.
-
02-06-2023, 12:18 PM
#116
Time for a Cona coffee down the road Wayne.. .
-
02-06-2023, 12:18 PM
#117
Originally Posted by Panda-NZ-
I'm not the one who wants to give the current mayor an extra $2b in funding here.
$2.3 billion out of ‘shares’ and into paying off some of the debt mountain. Nothing ‘extra’ about that, it’s acting as a responsible city council with the priorities of a city council - rather than as a de facto investment entity.
Moreover, a council should stick to its knitting - providing essential services - rather than becoming a vehicle for forays into all sorts of other activities which quite frankly waste ratepayer money.
-
02-06-2023, 12:27 PM
#118
Originally Posted by Logen Ninefingers
$2.3 billion out of ‘shares’ and into paying off some of the debt mountain. Nothing ‘extra’ about that, it’s acting as a responsible city council with the priorities of a city council - rather than as a de facto investment entity.
It's like a savings account - and wayne wants to raid it.
-
02-06-2023, 12:39 PM
#119
Auckland council credit rating: AA stable.
Last edited by Panda-NZ-; 02-06-2023 at 12:44 PM.
-
02-06-2023, 12:48 PM
#120
Originally Posted by Logen Ninefingers
$2.3 billion out of ‘shares’ and into paying off some of the debt mountain. Nothing ‘extra’ about that, it’s acting as a responsible city council with the priorities of a city council - rather than as a de facto investment entity.
Moreover, a council should stick to its knitting - providing essential services - rather than becoming a vehicle for forays into all sorts of other activities which quite frankly waste ratepayer money.
Bernard Hickey says selling the City's golf courses would make better sense, would make close to $3 billion and save more than $160 million per year.
Golf is hardly an essential service for Councils, whereas the Airport is a vital strategic asset.
Wonder why this alternative or better still a mix of both Airport shares & some courses isn't being discussed more widely?
Enlightenment anyone?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks