-
26-10-2023, 09:27 AM
#1251
Looks like a situation pre 2017 where Vector was part owner of NWF. They just ran it into the ground.
Not sure how many people are going to take up rights at a premium. Seems like a weird strategy. Good luck to MEL.
That said, if I were a NWF shareholder, it takes away some of the uncertainty about "who is going to pay for the regeneration" aspect.
-
26-10-2023, 11:01 AM
#1252
Originally Posted by blackcap
Looks like a situation pre 2017 where Vector was part owner of NWF. They just ran it into the ground.
Not sure how many people are going to take up rights at a premium. Seems like a weird strategy. Good luck to MEL.
That said, if I were a NWF shareholder, it takes away some of the uncertainty about "who is going to pay for the regeneration" aspect.
Just the opposite-new turbines standing well-above the ground and a gentailer buying in.
Hydro and wind generation are ideal partners.
-
26-10-2023, 11:27 AM
#1253
Originally Posted by fish
Just the opposite-new turbines standing well-above the ground and a gentailer buying in.
Hydro and wind generation are ideal partners.
Agree hydro and wind are good partners.
I am more concerned about the JV will be small change for MEL, just like it was for VCT. That can create its own problems.
Wind being unreliable is always going to be an inferior source of energy.
-
26-10-2023, 12:00 PM
#1254
Originally Posted by blackcap
Agree hydro and wind are good partners.
I am more concerned about the JV will be small change for MEL, just like it was for VCT. That can create its own problems.
Wind being unreliable is always going to be an inferior source of energy.
Small change for MEL agreed and that is also good-could be a step to a takeover in years to come .
Positive news for all
-
26-10-2023, 12:02 PM
#1255
Originally Posted by fish
Small change for MEL agreed and that is also good-could be a step to a takeover in years to come .
Positive news for all
I had not considered the T/O target. It does make more sense for MEL than VCT to take over.
Lets see how invested they are..
-
26-10-2023, 12:04 PM
#1256
Price is up 33% this morning to 16c.
-
26-10-2023, 12:42 PM
#1257
The devil will be in the detail. Mel is making a capped contribution, will they pay 50/50? or will the assets that NWF brings - land, consents etc be fairly taken into account? At this stage it looks like they will be with assets transferred at above book value, if so, that is a good outcome.
Last edited by Walter; 26-10-2023 at 01:09 PM.
-
26-10-2023, 01:10 PM
#1258
How does this new deal anywhere near stack up ?
Cap Raise $ 12.7 M (MEL & existing holders Rights Offer)
Cap Cost $500-$600 M
There will be costs of running it, downtime while being repowered, likely large
financing cost at high or increasing interest rates, Amortisation / depreciation
NWF doesn't have much dough, Borrowings if from MEL would have a cost, as from
third party lenders.
Based on past production patterns at the site, these are all over the place.
Sales & realisations from production have been all over the place too
Is there intended a production take up agreement where MEL take all the generation
and at what sort of price ?
Security of take up & onsale has been a past issue, with large derivative gains & losses
and then the whole job at mercy of Mother Nature supplying enough puff first
Go back to when NWF started & initial IPO issue at $1 - all those investors were sold something
for them to put dough into this .. the best part of $100 M later where are they now ?
Does this have possibilities of a repeat ?
Why has MEL not gone for Take Out Offer instead if the real estate for a revitalised windfarm
appears that good to them ?
Current SP level may or may not offer a good take out positioning
Last edited by nztx; 26-10-2023 at 01:28 PM.
-
26-10-2023, 10:03 PM
#1259
Member
Current SP is lower than Median purchasing price and pro-rata renounceable rights issue price. Not much time to mark around, shot up shot up shot up.
-
26-10-2023, 11:32 PM
#1260
Originally Posted by flyinglizard
Current SP is lower than Median purchasing price and pro-rata renounceable rights issue price. Not much time to mark around, shot up shot up shot up.
but then there is this:
https://www.nzx.com/announcements/420505
NWF will also undertake a pro-rata renounceable 1:8.5 rights issue of approximately 39.0m shares to existing NWF shareholders at a price of $0.155 per share (the same price as the Meridian placement), raising up to approximately $6.0m (Offer).
The Offer will be underwritten by Meridian up to approximately 28.8m shares (being up to approximately $4.5m).
Dont like the Rights deal ? .. fine - they get handed on a plate to MEL
(NWF must like MEL coming along stumping up more loot)
The Board is delighted that Meridian is prepared to become a supportive minority shareholder in NWF
The 15% MEL buy in pre Rights issue could turn into something else, post rights issue,
then a hop skip and a jump further down the track
No Div since Dec 2022 might be interesting weighing point for existing.. why throw more at it @ higher than Market ?
NWF Board could have just made it easier for existing holders - sell the assets in a new subsidiary to MEL
distribute the spare loot and then decide thereafter where the listed NWF shell goes or does,
seeing as strategy appears to be likely headed towards selling the NWF jewels off to MEL
one way or another .. Why else are MEL interested in getting in NWF .. it won't be to say hello
around the boardroom table a few times a year, if other prospectives are seen with NWF.
Lets face it anyone see NWF finding or falling on $500-600 M for the repowering as the picture so
far looks ?
That is unless Shane Jones's PGF gets a fresh breath to inflate any Wind Projects visible across
the Land ..
Last edited by nztx; 26-10-2023 at 11:59 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks