sharetrader
Page 87 of 283 FirstFirst ... 377783848586878889909197137187 ... LastLast
Results 861 to 870 of 2823
  1. #861
    Senior Member Halebop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,172

    Default

    SNAP. I obviously type too slow.

  2. #862
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Halebop View Post
    Their intent is clearly tax minimisation and capital gains rather than income, the true acid test.
    As is probably the case with most property investors. How often have we heard on these forums “I bought a great property and got 9.7% gross yield out of it this year” – not very often. But we have heard the wonders of capital growth ad nauseum.

  3. #863
    Member tobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    451

    Default yeeeehar

    Quote Originally Posted by funguspudding View Post
    Sorry Tobo but you are wrong.
    LOL, thanks FP, and Halebop,
    In this case I am pleased to be wrong.
    (I think i was confusing the issue of trading versus investing, which is about cap gains, with this issue of claiming on costs of LT equity investing.)

    Again, many thanks for clearing that up.

  4. #864
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tobo View Post
    LOL, thanks FP, and Halebop,
    In this case I am pleased to be wrong.
    (I think i was confusing the issue of trading versus investing, which is about cap gains, with this issue of claiming on costs of LT equity investing.)

    Again, many thanks for clearing that up.
    We are all here to help!
    Death will be reality, Life is just an illusion.

  5. #865
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Auckland, , .
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    You guys better get in quick

    Tide may be turning
    A surge in house-buying last week has prompted warnings that first-home buyers holding out for a bargain should get in before they miss out.


    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/3/...ectid=10510758
    Interesting real estate agent comment in the article:

    Tony Ebert, owner of Milford Real Estate, says sales volumes on the North Shore are down by more than half, because vendors are not selling under pressure, but prices have held up. That is because the North Shore has held its desirability, he says.

    Ebert predicts sales will pick up in spring. Despite being about 20,000 transactions down since January, his company has noticed sales and interest increased last week.

    "I think the interest rate drops in the past week and the Reserve Bank saying it will reduce the cash figure in September is a signal that things may be starting to return to normal."

    The last official comment from the Reseve Bank was that interest rates are on hold for a time yet. If they do drop rates it will because the economy is slowing rapidly, hardly a positive situation for the housing market, despite what real estate agents are saying.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Take what you need, leave the rest.

  6. #866
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,454

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hiawatha View Post
    I seem to recall that when Muldoon was PM he introduced some rule that if you sold an investment property within 10 years of buying it, any interest claimed as a deduction was clawed back if no taxable income had been returned in respect of that property. This was to make interst non deductible when the the only profit was coming from a capital gain.
    It would seem that a similar problem might arise with shares if interest is deductible regardless of whether or not a dividend is actually paid.
    hiawatha

    Muldoon's misguided effort was known as clawback tax. If selling an investment property under 10 years of ownership the vendor had the choice of paying tax on the lesser of interest claimed or capital gained. Like silly Rowling's speculation tax it acheived the opposite of what it was intended to do, by drying up the market sending prices upward. The beauty of the clawback tax was if you simply ignored it, nobody came looking for it. It did not apply to shares, and still doesn't as long as the shares are purchased for the income and not simply for a profit on sale. Intention is the key.

  7. #867
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,454

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hiawatha View Post
    I don't think that the "drying up of the market" was the opposite of what was intended. I think Muldoon simply wasnted to reinforce standard tax law. Under tax law one can only claim a deduction if one earns, or hopes to earn, a taxable income.
    As far as "no-one coming looking for it" is concerned, I don't think this is relevant. Elegibility for tax is supposed to be declared in one's tax return. Failure to do so is fraud.
    hiawatha

    Muldoon wanted to take the heat out of the property market as all politicians seem to want to do in a busy market rather than just let it cycle through the peaks and troughs. Remember - Muldoon was a socialist in drag.
    As far as payment of the tax: on selling a property on which interest had been claimed, you had to complete and submit a form showing both calculations, interest claimed and capital gained, and stating which one you wished to pay. Once submitted the IRD checked the calculations and if satisfied, simply sent you a bill for the amount. They seldom bothered to send the bill. As I said, they didn't come looking for it.

  8. #868
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,454

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hiawatha View Post
    You are probably right. Nevertheless there is certainly a problem in equity if interest is claimed as a deduction when rents are not being charged or dividends not received, and tax is not paid on "capital" gains.
    hiawatha

    But interest cannot be claimed where there is no intention of receiving rent as where rents are not being charged. Income tax is incurred where properties are bought and sold for profit, or spec. built. There is no real problem. IRD have been known to decline interest claims where properties have no chance of making a rental profit in the foreseeable future. They have also put considerable effort into policing sales in hotspots like Queenstown. Anyone buying a section simply for resale and not declaring the profit is liable for a knock on the door.
    It will be interesting to see the IRD's view on sales of section over the next few years, and whether they will allow claims on losses. There will be so much burnt flesh over some of the delayed settlement deals - particularly in Wanaka, that there will udoubtedly be claims.

  9. #869
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,221

    Default

    Would any of you first-home buyers consider the shared-equity scheme to get on the property ladder? Or would any of you property investors consider abusing the scheme as suggested?

    Property investors could target shared-equity scheme

    Thursday's Budget confirmed $35 million in new capital will be spent in the next two years to help families with a shared equity pilot scheme to get about 700 households into starter homes.

    But Alastair Helm, chief executive of realestate.co.nz - owned by large agencies and the Real Estate Institute - says landlords might take advantage of the scheme.

    Housing Minister Maryan Street wants to target people who had saved a deposit for a home but who cannot get on the property ladder in the area where they live and work because prices are too far ahead of the maximum mortgage they can afford. Shared equity involves the Government taking an equity share in a house to reduce the size of an aspiring home owners' mortgage.
    Death will be reality, Life is just an illusion.

  10. #870
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Well, what do I know. Had a property on my watch list which I reckoned would go for around $790 - $820k but sold for $900. I’m going to have to watch the market closer as other properties I’ve been watching haven’t been going at reduced prices.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •