sharetrader
Results 1 to 10 of 2956

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Try explaining his statement, Enumerate and we will continue the discussion.
    Where are the facts?

    Clearly, the SFO has a position on all of this. However, why is this basic "fact collecting" occurring under an order of Statutory Management? The Statutory Manager has presented little more than hearsay - heavily qualified with "mays" or " appears".

    It is also interesting to note that no formal charges have been laid.

    I don't have a copy of Allan Hubbard's journals. How can I respond to statements you make when you yourself have no evidence.

    You are, at best, amusing yourself with idle speculation.

    The matters that we can comment on - such as questions as to "why this process is being conducted under statutory management?" and "surely these matters could be dealt with under the Securities Act or the Companies Act?" - your contributions are, frankly, less than insightful.
    Last edited by Enumerate; 17-07-2010 at 11:22 AM.
    Do not consider my postings as investment advice. I am here to share research and to speculate on what might be. The boundary between fact and conjecture might not always be clear - best to treat all comments as speculation.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •