sharetrader
Results 1 to 10 of 2924

Threaded View

  1. #10
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,430

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    When they hock off a Pizza Hut store to a private owner do they collect any ongoing franchise fees from the new owner

    If so where does this shoe in the accounts .... anybody know

    Hocking off something making a loss .... but still clipping the ticket on the way through for use of the name should be +ve for RBD .... yes?
    Winner the reason that certain Pizza Huts are being sold is that RBD management have the view those business units cannot be profitable under the RBD corporate model. When a PH is sold off by RBD, then RBD wipes its hand of it and the new owner pays any franchise fees due to YUM directly.

    However with a national chain like this there is a single NZ nationwide marketing umbrella that covers all NZ PH outlets. I believe that RBD does control this. So some of those YUM franchise fees will find their way back into RBD coffers as a way for those new franchisees to pay their share of the nationwide advertising costs.

    The answer to your question is yes there should be some ongoing economies of advertising scale benefits to RBD as a result of these new franchisees pumping up the RBD marketing department. I suspect it will show up under that catchall header 'other income'.

    Nevertheless the real benefits once a PH is sold will flow mainly to master franchise holder YUM, not RBD.

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 05-04-2012 at 04:25 PM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •