-
19-08-2013, 09:29 AM
#141
Originally Posted by Schrodinger
Anyone have or know of what happened to 42 below in its first few years?
While it did make continual losses, this was planned (much like Xero now).
It didn't miss sales targets.
-
19-08-2013, 01:19 PM
#142
Originally Posted by SparkyTheClown
So they disclosed they sold 45 thou sharechat...that's all they had to disclose
Wonder how many more they sold ..... To be consistent MOA became too risky for their clients so hopefully the lot
-
19-08-2013, 01:29 PM
#143
Originally Posted by SparkyTheClown
My maths aren't good but they have gone from 1.8m shares to 1.485m shares, yet only disclose selling 45k shares. Shouldn't they be disclosing at least 315k sold?
-
19-08-2013, 01:38 PM
#144
Originally Posted by CJ
My maths aren't good but they have gone from 1.8m shares to 1.485m shares, yet only disclose selling 45k shares. Shouldn't they be disclosing at least 315k sold?
Think they only need to disclose the actual sale that took them below the 5%
But then again you would think that they would then say they only had that reduced number eh
Maybe they did sell 315k The others at a lower price than the 45k and were trying to hide that loss
-
19-08-2013, 01:42 PM
#145
Originally Posted by winner69
Think they only need to disclose the actual sale that took them below the 5%
But then again you would think that they would then say they only had that reduced number eh
Maybe they did sell 315k The others at a lower price than the 45k and were trying to hide that loss
Note this line on the Ann
. Following the above trade Milford Asset Management ceased to be a substantial share holder.
And the words THE ABOVE TRADE
-
19-08-2013, 01:59 PM
#146
Originally Posted by moosie_900
Wow, sell sell sell! Any price weakness in a stock and they are just selling! I don't blame them for Moa though, terrible idea even to begin with investing in them. Guess they'll be going out to buy more BFW now!
Anyone remember the original Steinlager. Trashy, ****ty tasting export beer that was a hit outside NZ?
So bad they had to rebrand it to Steinlager Pure to get the locals to drink it..
-
19-08-2013, 02:00 PM
#147
Originally Posted by winner69
Note this line on the Ann
. Following the above trade Milford Asset Management ceased to be a substantial share holder.
And the words THE ABOVE TRADE
Thats not it. Selling 45k onlyl takes them down to 5.8%
They need to sell the full 315k to take them down to 5.92%.
-
19-08-2013, 02:24 PM
#148
Originally Posted by Schrodinger
Anyone remember the original Steinlager. Trashy, ****ty tasting export beer that was a hit outside NZ?
So bad they had to rebrand it to Steinlager Pure to get the locals to drink it..
That doesn't accord with my early memories of Steinlager. As I recall, it was a big hit with the yuppies of that era who had been brought up on 6 o'clock closing, draught beer by the jug and the likes of Lion Red (and Brown), DB, Champion, Wards, Speights etc - in big bottles. Not a huge selection there and very little, expensive, imported brews available. But then, I might just be looking at those times through rose coloured taste buds!
-
19-08-2013, 02:28 PM
#149
Originally Posted by CJ
Thats not it. Selling 45k onlyl takes them down to 5.8%
They need to sell the full 315k to take them down to 5.92%.
Maybe the 475k was the last trade then
Then again I have seen some ssh notices that list every trade in the time period between announcements
-
19-08-2013, 04:01 PM
#150
MOA was always a gamble on the reputation of the Geoff Ross though wasn't it?
If he could do it with vodka then why not with beer?
Unfortunately they are two different products in very different markets with completely different consumers.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks