-
21-01-2014, 08:03 AM
#2071
Originally Posted by moosie_900
Moosie can only buy so many!
Great you have a sense of humor, Moose!
Because Sorehead and Derek are laughing all the way to the bank - selling their 0.5c entry price shares to you at 12c.
-
21-01-2014, 08:13 AM
#2072
Originally Posted by moosie_900
Moosie can only buy so many!
So moose buy no more .... Will need to find willing tassie tigers and wombats and wallabies won't they
-
21-01-2014, 09:03 AM
#2073
Originally Posted by moosie_900
I'm in for a fun time, not a long time Balance. You should know that by now!
My sense of humour is well tuned. I give Sparky a run for his clown money every ince in awhile
Ditto re fun time
-
21-01-2014, 09:42 AM
#2074
There is no question that mobile apps and ads are taking off and growing exponentially.
In common with all high growth industries however, will be a large number of players - existing and new, attracted by the growth and the opportunities.
Many of these players will fall by the wayside.
Remember the ISPs? Remember the mobile phone players?
Question then - who are the players in the mobile ads industry and what are their competitive edges?
Using revenues as a guide is dumb analysis as market share can be bought. Any assessment of a company's prospects must be based upon an understanding of the underlying profitability of the revenue streams. This is why forecasts are important or a clear understanding of a company's overall strategy.
Example - 42 Below never made a cent in profit but it's strategy of market share to attract a buyer was clear from day 1. Rakon made profits but lost it all as its competitive edge was eroded when GPS went mainstream.
The thing to note is that during a company's initial ramp-up to scale and profitability, cash burn is a feature so capital has to be conserved. Market appetite has to be managed rto facilitate more capital raising.
Over to you, Moose (ex- Chief Derek Handley cheerleader).
Last edited by Balance; 21-01-2014 at 09:54 AM.
-
21-01-2014, 09:43 AM
#2075
Junior Member
Originally Posted by Balance
...laughing all the way to the bank - selling their 0.5c entry price shares to you at 12c.
Bakery Boys had their fingers in Snakk via the Hyperfactory. They've been in deep since before 2008 - http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/42-belo...-venture-35670
Sorenson & Seadragon bought into Snakk in 2010 - only a few months after the Hyperfactory sale went through - risky times for Snakk hence the price - https://nzx.com/companies/SEA/announcements/204214
Early stage investors take highest risk and so deserve their profit. What is the actual problem here?
-
21-01-2014, 09:46 AM
#2076
Still not convinced about the margins on this business.
Can someone confirm that they run a service style business with a tech platform bolted on? Do they get a revenue share option for campagins or are they just commissioned to produce a campagin and get paid for that service.
-
21-01-2014, 09:49 AM
#2077
Originally Posted by Balance
There is no question that mobile apps and ads are taking off and growing exponentially.
In common with all high growth industries however, will be a large number of players - existing and new, attracted by the growth and the opportunities.
Many of these players will fall by the wayside.
Remember the ISPs? Remember the mobile phone players?
Question then - who are the players in the mobile ads industry and what are their competitive edges?
Using revenues as a guide is dumb analysis as market share can be bought. Any assessment of a company's prospects must be based upon an understanding of the underlying profitability of the revenue streams. This is why forecasts are important or a clear understanding of a company's overall strategy.
Example - 42 Below never made a cent in profit but it's strategy of market share to attract a buyer was clear from day 1. Rakon made profits but lost it all as its competitive edge was eroded when GPS went mainstream.
The thing to note is that during a company's initial ramp-up to scale and profitability, cash burn is a feature so capital has to be conserved. Market appetite has to be managed rto facilitate more capital raising.
Over to you, Moose (Chief Derek Handley cheerleader).
Good points Balance. I am more interested in their future profits than their current revenues. This is a completely different model to Xero which can benefit hugely from economies of scale.
-
21-01-2014, 09:50 AM
#2078
Originally Posted by Swiftideas
Which is why one of the business bakery boys can afford a LaFerrari
-
21-01-2014, 09:52 AM
#2079
Member
The update seems to have sparked a few buyers into action this morning
-
21-01-2014, 10:01 AM
#2080
wonder where the extra sellers at 12 came from?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks