-
22-08-2014, 08:59 AM
#9011
Included in key targets this year were revenue growth from the US, in which Dr Darling expected cashflow to offset annual losses.
-
22-08-2014, 09:02 AM
#9012
Originally Posted by NewGuy
And no, this wasn't the bit that I deemed new or interesting
Maybe this bit then...:
Included in key targets this year were revenue growth from the US, in which Dr Darling expected cashflow to offset annual losses.
However, the word "against" might have been missed out in which case it doesn't sound that interesting....
-
22-08-2014, 09:07 AM
#9013
Originally Posted by BigBob
Maybe this bit then...:
Included in key targets this year were revenue growth from the US, in which Dr Darling expected cashflow to offset annual losses.
However, the word "against" might have been missed out in which case it doesn't sound that interesting....
Doesn't that mean profit this year?
-
22-08-2014, 09:07 AM
#9014
I'm a wee bit cautious these days about what is reported .... so um....
-
22-08-2014, 09:13 AM
#9015
Dont forget the sales up dates at HY and FY for the next 4 to 5 years, next one is November, thats only three months away. Isnt it exciting.
Three more months of scintillating argument, snappy repartee, projections, banter, confusion, analysis and insight.
Reckon we could break the 15000 posts barrier by then.
-
22-08-2014, 09:24 AM
#9016
Originally Posted by snapiti
Really did she say that..... are you sure........sorry to say but there has been 3 other bio markers commercially available in the US over the last 20 years targeting bladder cancer so unfortunately if Jacquis said that she is talking a load of s%&t.
There are at least 2 that are still being sold commercially to urologist.
It would be very disappointing if she is making up stories to talk the product up.
Did anyone else hear this.
The big thing that I brought away with me from the AGM is there a lot on here who are simply over thinking things. It really isn't that hard. Either you believe in what they are doing (in the open & behind the scenes) - or you don't! The AGM is the AGM and what was publicised during the meeting was enough for me to believe they are on track with what they have stated - contrary to what the conspiracists and bears etc would have us believe. They are simply carrying out their stated plan and the bits I went to listen for - were clearly stated.
However - the REAL GOLD came at the after match. And no, I am not going to put it on here - simply to have it turned into a target.
Hope you got some fish the other day Snapiti.
-
22-08-2014, 09:25 AM
#9017
Originally Posted by moosie_900
MAC, you FX rate is way too high. You can at least be bullish on that matter!
Because the five year target is provided by Pacific Edge in NZD, we are largley all using their forward exchange rate, whatever that may be. The rest is incidentals really, at 0.85 that's fine.
Last edited by MAC; 22-08-2014 at 04:45 PM.
-
22-08-2014, 09:27 AM
#9018
Originally Posted by NewGuy
what worries me is that this gives the impression they will build the additional capacity earlier than later. Have they ever heard of JIT manufacturing? And no, this wasn't the bit that I deemed new or interesting
Yeah that's right NG. If those pesky cancer sufferers could just organize themselves to get cancer at a uniform rate of 50 patients per day then we could really crank the efficiencies of the lab using JIT and extract more from them!
-
22-08-2014, 09:34 AM
#9019
Member
Originally Posted by Dentie
The big thing that I brought away with me from the AGM is there a lot on here who are simply over thinking things. It really isn't that hard. Either you believe in what they are doing (in the open & behind the scenes) - or you don't! The AGM is the AGM and what was publicised during the meeting was enough for me to believe they are on track with what they have stated - contrary to what the conspiracists and bears etc would have us believe. They are simply carrying out their stated plan and the bits I went to listen for - were clearly stated.
However - the REAL GOLD came at the after match. And no, I am not going to put it on here - simply to have it turned into a target.
Hope you got some fish the other day Snapiti.
At last, a rational view. Cheers Dentie.
-
22-08-2014, 09:35 AM
#9020
Originally Posted by NewGuy
Yeah, you are right. They should just go out RIGHT NOW and build a lab with 9 times the capacity of the current one. That would be a really smart decision and not at all a waste of precious capital.
Don't be silly NG. They never said they're about to go out and do this. Give them some credit. They're simply assaying they'll need to do it when the time comes. Whenever that may be
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks