-
05-10-2015, 01:49 PM
#6401
Originally Posted by iceman
I think with the Sportzone case and liabilities unresolved, an offer for MTF can only be regarded as reckless !!
Exactly......................
-
05-10-2015, 02:21 PM
#6402
Originally Posted by iceman
I think with the Sportzone case and liabilities unresolved, an offer for MTF can only be regarded as reckless !!
Originally Posted by percy
Exactly......................
Yes I wouldn't be happy at all if I was a shareholder in Turners. This for all intents and purposes looks like a punt on a binary event with potential for significant value destruction...a punt on a blocking stake. How do Turners directors think they can fairly value MTF shares in the circumstances ?
The mind boggles to understand how Turners directors are exercising their fiduciary obligations to shareholders in good faith and in their best interests.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiduciary Maybe they want to reflect on the definition of fiduciary duty.
Last edited by Beagle; 05-10-2015 at 02:30 PM.
-
05-10-2015, 03:33 PM
#6403
Originally Posted by Roger
Yes I wouldn't be happy at all if I was a shareholder in Turners. This for all intents and purposes looks like a punt on a binary event with potential for significant value destruction...a punt on a blocking stake. How do Turners directors think they can fairly value MTF shares in the circumstances ?
The mind boggles to understand how Turners directors are exercising their fiduciary obligations to shareholders in good faith and in their best interests.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiduciary Maybe they want to reflect on the definition of fiduciary duty.
Is it a decision made at board level though or at exec level?
-
05-10-2015, 03:46 PM
#6404
Originally Posted by blackcap
Is it a decision made at board level though or at exec level?
To make an offer public, it would have to be at the board level in my view.
-
05-10-2015, 07:35 PM
#6405
Reading between the lines,I think HNZ have done a deal with MTF,and regardless of the outcome will make an offer or maybe some other deal.
Otherwise why postpone the AGM? And didn't MTF sort of support HNZs interest in the company.
-
05-10-2015, 07:43 PM
#6406
Originally Posted by kizame
Reading between the lines,I think HNZ have done a deal with MTF,and regardless of the outcome will make an offer or maybe some other deal.
Otherwise why postpone the AGM? And didn't MTF sort of support HNZs interest in the company.
ASM postponed as Paper Tiger pointed out it clashed with the directors off to the Melbourne Cup.
You guys read too much into announcements
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
06-10-2015, 07:56 AM
#6407
Originally Posted by winner69
ASM postponed as Paper Tiger pointed out it clashed with the directors off to the Melbourne Cup.
You guys read too much into announcements
Your probably right on the money. Some diligent CFO or coy secretary would have scheduled for between 2 and 4 Nov until some keen director punter pointed out that Tuesday falls there... ok lets postpone...
-
06-10-2015, 08:42 AM
#6408
Originally Posted by blackcap
Your probably right on the money. Some diligent CFO or coy secretary would have scheduled for between 2 and 4 Nov until some keen director punter pointed out that Tuesday falls there... ok lets postpone...
Yeah Right.!!!
I think there's a bit more to it than that.!
Most probably "invested" in a horse which is a "dead cert" to win The Cup.!.................
Well, we do know they have a small exposure to cows,but no mention has been made of horses.
lol.
-
06-10-2015, 09:06 AM
#6409
Originally Posted by percy
Yeah Right.!!!
I think there's a bit more to it than that.!
Most probably "invested" in a horse which is a "dead cert" to win The Cup.!.................
Well, we do know they have a small exposure to cows,but no mention has been made of horses.
lol.
Perhaps they have a few spare dairy cows and they're running them in the race to give them something to do.
-
06-10-2015, 10:45 AM
#6410
Originally Posted by kizame
Reading between the lines,I think HNZ have done a deal with MTF,and regardless of the outcome will make an offer or maybe some other deal.
Otherwise why postpone the AGM? And didn't MTF sort of support HNZs interest in the company.
There has been harsh words between these two companies before so I think you're drawing a very long bow with that speculation.
Originally Posted by Harvey Specter
To make an offer public, it would have to be at the board level in my view.
Agreed.
MTF constitution requires consent of the company for any shareholder to own more than 10% thereof, (source, content contained in Turners notice of proposal to acquire 20% stake).
Anyone looking to take this puppy over will need to be working closely with its directors.
Perhaps they have a few spare dairy cows and they're running them in the race to give them something to do.
LOL too funny !!
Last edited by Beagle; 06-10-2015 at 10:48 AM.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks