-
02-11-2015, 08:16 PM
#3831
Tongue in Cheek
Well if you QUEST FOR MORE then:
sell your Air New Zealand shares trading at a mere 6.3% discount to broker consensus;
and
buy Qantas with their 14% discount to broker consensus and where you get the added bonus of
true All Blacks support:
Best Wishes
Paper Tiger
-
02-11-2015, 09:00 PM
#3832
Qantas crew dressed up in all blacks colours, priceless!!!at least we got one up here.
-
02-11-2015, 10:29 PM
#3833
Originally Posted by sb9
Qantas crew dressed up in all blacks colours, priceless!!!at least we got one up here.
Ironic though that all the crew apart from the co pilot were kiwi...maybe qantas got the last laugh haha
-
03-11-2015, 01:46 AM
#3834
Originally Posted by brend
Ironic though that all the crew apart from the co pilot were kiwi...maybe qantas got the last laugh haha
They were probably kiwi staff from Queer and Nasty Airlines NZ subsidiary Jetconnect.
Jetconnect operates 737's in Queer and Nasty livery. Stabling trans-tasman aircraft in NZ allows higher aircraft utilisation.
Employing cheaper Kiwi aircrew also gives the union bashers in senior management and the boardroom at Queer and Nasty Airlines a bit of a happy buzz as well.
Boop boop de do
Marilyn
-
03-11-2015, 07:58 AM
#3835
Member
If the Russian A320 disaster was not sabotage then I imagine AIR price could keep going south. They have around thirty A320's and a world wide grounding won't be pretty.
Last edited by tony64peter; 03-11-2015 at 08:41 AM.
-
03-11-2015, 08:40 AM
#3836
Originally Posted by tony64peter
If the Russian A320 disaster was not sabotage then I imagine AIR price could keep going south. They have thirty plus A320's and a world wide grounding won't be pretty.
Evidence points toward bomb, besides that plane had been in service for near on 20 years.
-
03-11-2015, 08:44 AM
#3837
Member
Originally Posted by couta1
Evidence points toward bomb, besides that plane had been in service for near on 20 years.
Same software and systems. Hope the evidence is right.
-
03-11-2015, 08:50 AM
#3838
Originally Posted by tony64peter
Same software and systems. Hope the evidence is right.
The plane suffered a sudden calamity and broke up in the air sounds way too extreme for a mechanical or technical fault with the pilot having no time to send out a distress call, this one has sabotage written all over it.
-
03-11-2015, 09:04 AM
#3839
From what I can see AIR has only 5 767s but this would have been a very different news item if the plane had been in the air
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/10/29/dynam...unway-faa.html
This was a 767 -200 and AIR have 767-300s so it may not be an issue at all if they are different beasts
It does seem more likely the Russian disaster was sabotage and if so things should settle in terms of the type of plane etc.,even if its not the case politically.
Last edited by skid; 03-11-2015 at 09:18 AM.
-
03-11-2015, 09:08 AM
#3840
Originally Posted by skid
What would you expect from a 30 year old plane that has been owned by several airlines?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks