Look Roger, I hear what you are saying and if you don't believe they will have future growth, than this is your opinion. We are all entitled to one.
However - this does not make it right to make wrong statements related to past performance:
year EPS
2012 4.7 cts
2013 4.5 cts
2014 6.5 cts
2015 7.8 cts
2016 11.1 cts
2017 10.5 cts
The early years are pro-forma (from their IPO prospectus, just in case you are wondering.
OK - there is a slight drop back in 2017 (we all know, why), and we obviously don't know whether 2018 will be better than 2017, but I still would not call this a static EPS. Would you ? Really?
Bookmarks