Share price is irrelevant its EPS that matters so don't follow the $1.02 v $5.62 arguement?
Yep agreed!---- so lets have a look? SUM has paid (approx) cps 2015 4 cents, 2016 6 cents, 2017 9 cents . I consider that very worthwhile. OCA looks likely to pay 2.1 cps for the 1st half of its financial year.
So as I see it share cost is indeed somewhat relevant.
Hey guys the emoticons are really useful to let people know your sentiment behind your post. For example quite often a post is meant to be humourous but its not interpreted without an aid like
Hey guys the emoticons are really useful to let people know your sentiment behind your post. For example quite often a post is meant to be humourous but its not interpreted without an aid like
Since joining I have found this forum delightfully informative and very helpful.
Ramping ??. I had to look the meaning up in Benjamin Graham's textbook on real value in the market. Ah ha got it --It's what Sir Bob Jones used to assist in making his $600 million fortune.
No way----- not me old Chaps--that's a Scurrilous claim-----I just look for value such as $42 mill profit and 1 $ billion of assets all for a buck and an IPO (more risky than a moon shot) that delivers more than it says it will. (and that is the rarest investment pearl of them all)
What’s this $42mill profit you talk about ....last years ot this year’s forecast?
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
Hello winner. Warren is my name. Well I'm not really talking about anything but I did go to the NZSX website and visit OCA and clicked on "Performance" then "Analysis" and this was the 1st line I saw
"Highlights"
- Reported net profit after tax increased by $20.5m (93%) compared with the prior corresponding period (pcp) to $42.5m due to strong uplift in valuation of investment properties, higher resale margins and sale of new retirement village units
Bookmarks