-
-
Originally Posted by Joshuatree
I have a problem with such reports. They don't tell the net after mgt / admin fees % returns and also don't tell the 'cumulative' returns for those funds ; especially since inception. Again I will wave the Warren Buffet flag. These funds will not beat the index return in the long long term because like at the casino, the odds are against them. Those that do beat the odds are just lucky in the short term.
-
Originally Posted by SBQ
I have a problem with such reports. They don't tell the net after mgt / admin fees % returns and also don't tell the 'cumulative' returns for those funds ; especially since inception. Again I will wave the Warren Buffet flag. These funds will not beat the index return in the long long term because like at the casino, the odds are against them. Those that do beat the odds are just lucky in the short term.
The total returns are after fees and before tax, so the fees are accounted for. I largely agree with your active/passive stance, but do be aware that at least some of the options presented are in fact passive funds, such as simplicity who I have my kiwi saver with. I expect to match the index minus the 0.3% fees, which is low in an NZ context but I admit still high internationally. Hopefully fees will continue to fall with increasing scale.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks