Do you think as the balance tips more in favour of tenants, there will be more landlords wishing to cash up and invest their money in shares in companies on NZ's small stock exchange thereby making it more worthwhile for companies to maintain their NZ listings?
Do you think as the balance tips more in favour of tenants, there will be more landlords wishing to cash up and invest their money in shares in companies on NZ's small stock exchange thereby making it more worthwhile for companies to maintain their NZ listings?
Do you think as the balance tips more in favour of tenants, there will be more landlords wishing to cash up and invest their money in shares in companies on NZ's small stock exchange thereby making it more worthwhile for companies to maintain their NZ listings?
Yes. I am seeing it within my own family.
And those new investors often already trust property. So the Retirement companies, VHP, PFI etc are probably going to form part of their investments that they are already comfortable with. So while they might be concerned about the sharemarket…..they may feel more confident with real estate sector of it.
Yes. I am seeing it within my own family.
And those new investors often already trust property. So the Retirement companies, VHP, PFI etc are probably going to form part of their investments that they are already comfortable with. So while they might be concerned about the sharemarket…..they may feel more confident with real estate sector of it.
The end game is that there will be fewer and fewer rentals on the market and rents will go up as demand increases and supply diminishes. My end game is to go through this short term pain with my rentals to reap the increased rent rewards in 3-5 years time. This is not good for renters no matter how well intentioned by this govt.
The end game is that there will be fewer and fewer rentals on the market and rents will go up as demand increases and supply diminishes. My end game is to go through this short term pain with my rentals to reap the increased rent rewards in 3-5 years time. This is not good for renters no matter how well intentioned by this govt.
It may be good in making property available for first time buyers looking for owner-occupation?
It may be good in making property available for first time buyers looking for owner-occupation?
It certainly will, as property prices may also fall as more supply comes on the market. Which will in turn drive up yields. So hopefully the market can balance things out. But its not going to be good for renters.
The end game is that there will be fewer and fewer rentals on the market and rents will go up as demand increases and supply diminishes. My end game is to go through this short term pain with my rentals to reap the increased rent rewards in 3-5 years time. This is not good for renters no matter how well intentioned by this govt.
But as we know we need more rentals ... the way its going future wise the Govt.(Taxpayers) will be building many more low cost accommodation blocks to put roofs over the heads of many thousands of kiwis that will rent for life
"With a good perspective on history, we can have a better understanding of the past and present, and thus a clear vision of the future." — Carlos Slim Helu
But as we know we need more rentals ... the way its going future wise the Govt.(Taxpayers) will be building many more low cost accommodation blocks to put roofs over the heads of many thousands of kiwis that will rent for life
We need more houses/apartments/units. We need more secure, safe and healthy abodes for families. Whether these are owned by landlords or owner occupiers is as much a political decision/fiscal decision as anything else.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by iceman
Bookmarks