Cynical Cindy should be careful what she wishes for. Her last election pledges don't make for very good fact checking. And the media are finally awake to Labour's track record on transparency despite the Cynical One's promises.
Apparently they use a Facebook transparency tool or something to ensure things are kosha
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
She's a career politician who just happens to be very good at being a public servant.
That's not meant as a compliment. It's not a big task when you consider the bunch of narcissistic losers currently running loose in the beehive and local government. Specifically Christchurch which is being sold up to the Chinese as we speak.
I would love to say can't wait to vote them out, but the fools that will replace them won't be any different.
Cynical Cindy should be careful what she wishes for. Her last election pledges don't make for very good fact checking. And the media are finally awake to Labour's track record on transparency despite the Cynical One's promises.
Wow! If anyone had doubt over her cynicism. The very day she loudly calls for factual campaigning she quietly culls a scrutiny mechanism. Smokescreen and virtue signalling specialist.
Wow! If anyone had doubt over her cynicism. The very day she loudly calls for factual campaigning she quietly culls a scrutiny mechanism. Smokescreen and virtue signalling specialist.
She really is evil beyond reproach isn't she. If this was the USA she would be getting impeached. Dirty politician is our Cindy.
You don't know? Maybe you should watch the news. Republican Senators who swore an oath to be impartial but suppress evidence and called the outcome of the hearing long before it started. Quite disgraceful.
But I guess we digress from the subject of this thread. My apologies for starting the digression.
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
You don't know? Maybe you should watch the news. Republican Senators who swore an oath to be impartial but suppress evidence and called the outcome of the hearing long before it started. Quite disgraceful.
But I guess we digress from the subject of this thread. My apologies for starting the digression.
The reason I don't know is because I often can't follow your rationale.
Bookmarks