sharetrader
Page 588 of 1961 FirstFirst ... 8848853857858458558658758858959059159259863868810881588 ... LastLast
Results 5,871 to 5,880 of 19604
  1. #5871
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    Likewise you could argue with interest rates at 200 year lows a market risk premium of 6% is no longer warranted especially given TRINA, (there really is no alternative to stocks).

    What else are you going to do, buy corporate bonds or bank term deposits at 1.8%?
    That’s why these things are all rather subjective and there’s no right answer.

    For each individual MRP is different as it’s related to what return they desire

    I suppose 6% is about right for these days

    Of course if one was interested one could work out the implied MRP as it is today.
    Last edited by winner69; 01-07-2020 at 11:18 AM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  2. #5872
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paradox View Post
    Some advice sought please. I've completed the first iteration of financial statement analysis to get the valuation and set the following parameters. is it too much/little? The outlook is for 5-years.

    riskfree rate (T-Bill) - 3.5%
    Market Risk premium - 7%
    Equity Beta 1.2 (in 2019 it was 1.1)

    So, cost of capital is 11.90%
    Cost of capital is the variable you twiddle to suit your agenda. Bit like discount rate (ie as an input rather than derived).

    For OCA I suspect some investors are happy to hold a bit of money in a stock that pays a relatively stable 5-6% div on the macro basis the capital/business is more likely to grow than shrink over 5 years regardless of some calculation riddled with assumptions.

  3. #5873
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,054

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dibble View Post
    Cost of capital is the variable you twiddle to suit your agenda. Bit like discount rate (ie as an input rather than derived).

    For OCA I suspect some investors are happy to hold a bit of money in a stock that pays a relatively stable 5-6% div on the macro basis the capital/business is more likely to grow than shrink over 5 years regardless of some calculation riddled with assumptions.
    thats a mighty assumption that its a stable dividend
    one step ahead of the herd

  4. #5874
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    landskrona sweden
    Posts
    4,308

    Default

    "stable Div" thats what we have wondered for a while now...we think its been paying out too high a Div.
    Last edited by Waltzing; 01-07-2020 at 01:06 PM.

  5. #5875
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    thats a mighty assumption that its a stable dividend
    Maybe a relationship exists between ‘assumptions’ and ‘wishful thinking’ / hope
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  6. #5876
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    thats a mighty assumption that its a stable dividend
    ...true but I did say 'relatively'. Likelihood of any div anywhere next year requires some level of the act of assuming. Bank deposit rates included...

  7. #5877
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    At a cafe somewhere
    Posts
    298

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    .................................................. Back to OCA, I wonder what EQT will offer for OCA when they have finished the MET takeover and look to combine these companies and reap maybe $10m per annum in synergies ? $1.30 ?
    $1.30 would be great
    Having said that, I've always wondered if OCA (or any of the other listed RV operators for that matter) ever considered buying MET for the 'instant' revaluation gains and synergies.
    I guess I'll never find out the answer to that tho!

  8. #5878
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dubya View Post
    $1.30 would be great
    Having said that, I've always wondered if OCA (or any of the other listed RV operators for that matter) ever considered buying MET for the 'instant' revaluation gains and synergies.
    I guess I'll never find out the answer to that tho!
    The dog might ask SUM hard questions at the forthcoming special meeting for MET about who the other two interested parties were and if they're still in the frame or was this just a load of "creative talk" to spur EQT along ?

    Interesting situation developing with OCA...it seems the daily share price performance shows a fairly strong correlation with the number of new virus cases in N.Z.
    Zero new cases the share price goes up a bit and when there's 2 or more new cases the share price goes down a bit. Is the market really this fickle or is this apparent share price reaction a figment of my sometimes over active imagination ?
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  9. #5879
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,729

    Default

    Dont know,but how about you and your pack going paws up and doing a possum covid symptom cluster; keep one eye open on the share price on a screen.

  10. #5880
    Membaa
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,321

    Default

    I thought that was an interesting question, but not sure whether this shows a correlation, if anything it was negatively correlated as the case counts rose, so was the share price rising. Then fell as the case counts declined, then rose as case counts went to zero. Now it's jumping around for no apparent reason related to case counts.

    Attachment 11735

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    Interesting situation developing with OCA...it seems the daily share price performance shows a fairly strong correlation with the number of new virus cases in N.Z.
    Zero new cases the share price goes up a bit and when there's 2 or more new cases the share price goes down a bit. Is the market really this fickle or is this apparent share price reaction a figment of my sometimes over active imagination ?

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •